[Bug ld/14170] ld: assertion fail /export/gnu/import/git/binutils/bfd/linker.c:641

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14170 --- Comment #10 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c7c970e4c63f81479539220874a98aa74bc0e090 commit c7c970e4c63f81479539220874a9

[Bug binutils/26154] New: nm-new: attempting free on address which was not malloc()

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154 Bug ID: 26154 Summary: nm-new: attempting free on address which was not malloc() Product: binutils Version: 2.34 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug binutils/26153] .gnu.version reported as orphan section even when not emitted

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26153 Nick Desaulniers changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maskray at google dot com -- You

[Bug binutils/26153] .gnu.version reported as orphan section even when not emitted

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26153 Nick Desaulniers changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ndesaulniers at google dot com --

[Bug binutils/26153] New: .gnu.version reported as orphan section even when not emitted

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26153 Bug ID: 26153 Summary: .gnu.version reported as orphan section even when not emitted Product: binutils Version: 2.34 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gas/26141] -fvisibility=hidden generates JUMP11 relocations on ARM

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26141 --- Comment #3 from Jason A. Donenfeld --- Hi Nick, Thanks for looking into this. I've uploaded a test script to reproduce the issue: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12644 You can see at the end of the script: + readelf -a

[Bug gas/26141] -fvisibility=hidden generates JUMP11 relocations on ARM

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26141 --- Comment #2 from Jason A. Donenfeld --- Created attachment 12644 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12644&action=edit test script to reproduce issue -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for t

[Bug binutils/26112] readelf --debug-dump=macro can't parse clang debug info

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26112 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/26112] readelf --debug-dump=macro can't parse clang debug info

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26112 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e4b7104b1e0c70613d0f553cb18d25c7343647d3 commit e4b7104b1e0c70613d0f553cb18

[Bug binutils/22136] Support marking "debug" info files with special ET_GNU_DEBUG_* values.

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22136 Carlos O'Donell changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/26150] Assertion failure at ldlang.c:7269 when using inline assembly, -flto and --no-whole-archive

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26150 --- Comment #9 from Pekka Seppänen --- Created attachment 12643 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12643&action=edit Testcase: Misc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/26150] Assertion failure at ldlang.c:7269 when using inline assembly, -flto and --no-whole-archive

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26150 --- Comment #6 from Pekka Seppänen --- Created attachment 12640 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12640&action=edit Testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/26150] Assertion failure at ldlang.c:7269 when using inline assembly, -flto and --no-whole-archive

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26150 --- Comment #2 from Pekka Seppänen --- Created attachment 12636 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12636&action=edit Testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/26150] Assertion failure at ldlang.c:7269 when using inline assembly, -flto and --no-whole-archive

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26150 --- Comment #7 from Pekka Seppänen --- Created attachment 12641 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12641&action=edit Testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/26150] Assertion failure at ldlang.c:7269 when using inline assembly, -flto and --no-whole-archive

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26150 --- Comment #8 from Pekka Seppänen --- Created attachment 12642 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12642&action=edit Testcase: Driver -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/26150] Assertion failure at ldlang.c:7269 when using inline assembly, -flto and --no-whole-archive

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26150 --- Comment #5 from Pekka Seppänen --- Created attachment 12639 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12639&action=edit Testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/26150] Assertion failure at ldlang.c:7269 when using inline assembly, -flto and --no-whole-archive

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26150 --- Comment #3 from Pekka Seppänen --- Created attachment 12637 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12637&action=edit Testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/26150] Assertion failure at ldlang.c:7269 when using inline assembly, -flto and --no-whole-archive

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26150 --- Comment #4 from Pekka Seppänen --- Created attachment 12638 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12638&action=edit Testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/26150] Assertion failure at ldlang.c:7269 when using inline assembly, -flto and --no-whole-archive

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26150 --- Comment #1 from Pekka Seppänen --- Created attachment 12635 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12635&action=edit Testcase: Makefile -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/26150] New: Assertion failure at ldlang.c:7269 when using inline assembly, -flto and --no-whole-archive

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26150 Bug ID: 26150 Summary: Assertion failure at ldlang.c:7269 when using inline assembly, -flto and --no-whole-archive Product: binutils Version: 2.35 (HEAD) Status: UNCON

[Bug gas/26143] gas generates invalid line table entry

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26143 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug gas/26141] -fvisibility=hidden generates JUMP11 relocations on ARM

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26141 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Jason, Are you able to provide a small test case that demonstrates the problem ? Generating a JUMP11 reloc for hidden symbols should be safe, provided that the symbol is within a valid range. So

[Bug binutils/26147] nm-new: heap-use-after-free in bfd/elf.c:2604 bfd_section_from_shdr

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26147 --- Comment #2 from Yin Qidi --- How can I obtain the latest version(2.35) feidi...@gmail.com From: amodra at gmail dot com Date: 2020-06-22 15:13 To: feidiyin Subject: [Bug binutils/26147] nm-new: heap-use-after-free in bfd/elf.c:2604 bfd

[Bug binutils/26005] [size] crash with ASAN in bfd_section_from_shdr

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26005 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||feidiyin at gmail dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug binutils/26147] nm-new: heap-use-after-free in bfd/elf.c:2604 bfd_section_from_shdr

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26147 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED