[Bug ld/25677] Changes to --*magic options for pdp11-aout target

2020-03-27 Thread casner at acm dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25677 --- Comment #2 from Stephen Casner --- I could use some guidance regarding running the testsuite. After reading the binutils porting document I have installed dejagnu, but I don't know what information is needed in the global config, for exam

[Bug gas/25738] spam

2020-03-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25738 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC|amodra at gmail dot com| -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug gas/25738] spam

2020-03-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25738 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|yeezy |spam Resolution|---

[Bug gas/25738] spam

2020-03-27 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25738 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com -- You are rece

Issue 20180 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Timeout in fuzz_bfd

2020-03-27 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #4 on issue 20180 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_bfd: Timeout in fuzz_bfd https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=20180#c4 This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #14 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu --- > (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #11) > >> >> That leaves us with the two pr20995-2 ones... >> > >> > Does Solaris support GNU_RELRO? If not, I can skip these for

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #11) > >> That leaves us with the two pr20995-2 ones... > > > > Does Solaris support GNU_RELRO? If not, I can skip these for Solaris. > > I'm pretty certain it doesn't.

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #12 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=258e884429c87ed5ebee2b7767e3955218ec064b commit 258e884429c87ed5ebee2b7767e3955

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #11 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- >> FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-23a-x86 >> FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-24a-x86 >> FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-25a-x86 >> >> the last three are highly dubious: Solaris ld.so.1 doesn't support

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #8) > > --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- > > > I stopped checking Solaris cross target since the result isn't clean. > > If Solaris cross target test becomes clean, I will

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=cacb9d871376da293c655efce8cf3a4f2feefbaa commit cacb9d871376da293c655efce8cf3a4f

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- > I stopped checking Solaris cross target since the result isn't clean. > If Solaris cross target test becomes clean, I will test Solaris cross I doubt I will be able to

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread levon at movementarian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #7 from John Levon --- Ah, I didn't notice those weren't gas. I only ran gas and binutils, not ld. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #5) > > --- Comment #4 from John Levon --- > > It's only the last 5 for me (running natively, but illumos not Solaris) > > That's most likely because gld testing assumes a

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #4 from John Levon --- > It's only the last 5 for me (running natively, but illumos not Solaris) That's most likely because gld testing assumes a gcc configured to use gld without an explicit

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread levon at movementarian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 --- Comment #4 from John Levon --- It's only the last 5 for me (running natively, but illumos not Solaris) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gas test-suite failures |test-suite failures with

[Bug gas/25738] New: yeezy

2020-03-27 Thread niuyu185 at 163 dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25738 Bug ID: 25738 Summary: yeezy Product: binutils Version: 2.34 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned a

[Bug gas/25732] gas test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread levon at movementarian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 John Levon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org -- You are receiv

[Bug gas/25732] gas test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

2020-03-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug binutils/23788] objcopy: src/steddNxf: failed to find link section for section 24

2020-03-27 Thread johnkaitlyn95 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23788 --- Comment #12 from Kaitlyn John --- This article is so helpful for me. I have follow the steps shared here. It was so beneficial for me. Thanks for sharing this useful tips which helped in fixing the issue easily. Hope to see more useful pos

[Bug binutils/23788] objcopy: src/steddNxf: failed to find link section for section 24

2020-03-27 Thread johnkaitlyn95 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23788 Kaitlyn John changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johnkaitlyn95 at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug binutils/25662] objcopy sets invalid sh_offset for the first section in a no_contents segment containing program headers

2020-03-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25662 --- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Jozef Lawrynowicz : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1fafefd59438f92206e65ea6b2022d82c5ccfe12 commit 1fafefd59438f92206e65

[Bug binutils/25737] New: Document which readelf and binutils options support debuginfod

2020-03-27 Thread marxin.liska at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25737 Bug ID: 25737 Summary: Document which readelf and binutils options support debuginfod Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no