[Bug ld/25617] ld should reconstruct dynamic symbol table from PT_DYNAMIC when there is no section header

2020-03-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #42 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Kaylee from comment #39) > Created attachment 12359 [details] > testcase for GNU_PROPERTY_NO_COPY_ON_PROTECTED segfault > > The attached file exports an `int foo`, linking against it will segfault

[Bug ld/25617] ld should reconstruct dynamic symbol table from PT_DYNAMIC when there is no section header

2020-03-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #41 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #40) > (In reply to Kaylee from comment #39) > > Created attachment 12359 [details] > > testcase for GNU_PROPERTY_NO_COPY_ON_PROTECTED segfault > > > > The attached file expor

[Bug ld/25617] ld should reconstruct dynamic symbol table from PT_DYNAMIC when there is no section header

2020-03-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #40 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Kaylee from comment #39) > Created attachment 12359 [details] > testcase for GNU_PROPERTY_NO_COPY_ON_PROTECTED segfault > > The attached file exports an `int foo`, linking against it will segfault

[Bug ld/25617] ld should reconstruct dynamic symbol table from PT_DYNAMIC when there is no section header

2020-03-08 Thread klkblake at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #34 from Kaylee --- I'm getting several failures: > FAIL: Build pr22393-2 (-z nosectionheader, none) > FAIL: Build pr22393-2 (PIE, -z nosectionheader, none) > FAIL: Build pr22393-2 (-z nosectionheader, objcopy) > FAIL: Build pr223

[Bug ld/25617] ld should reconstruct dynamic symbol table from PT_DYNAMIC when there is no section header

2020-03-08 Thread klkblake at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #39 from Kaylee --- Created attachment 12359 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12359&action=edit testcase for GNU_PROPERTY_NO_COPY_ON_PROTECTED segfault The attached file exports an `int foo`, linking against

[Bug ld/25617] ld should reconstruct dynamic symbol table from PT_DYNAMIC when there is no section header

2020-03-08 Thread klkblake at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #35 from Kaylee --- There are a couple of typos in the comments: "symbol stable", "string stable", and "memory chekers". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/25617] ld should reconstruct dynamic symbol table from PT_DYNAMIC when there is no section header

2020-03-08 Thread klkblake at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #38 from Kaylee --- > How can I reproduce it? Do they fail on master branch? Yeah, they fail on master for me. Additionally, I've just found out that ld segfaults when trying to link against a shared object with GNU_PROPERTY_NO_C

[Bug ld/25617] ld should reconstruct dynamic symbol table from PT_DYNAMIC when there is no section header

2020-03-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #37 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Kaylee from comment #35) > There are a couple of typos in the comments: "symbol stable", "string > stable", and "memory chekers". Fixed on users/hjl/pr25617/master branch. Thanks. -- You are re

[Bug ld/25617] ld should reconstruct dynamic symbol table from PT_DYNAMIC when there is no section header

2020-03-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #36 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Kaylee from comment #34) > I'm getting several failures: > > > FAIL: Build pr22393-2 (-z nosectionheader, none) > > FAIL: Build pr22393-2 (PIE, -z nosectionheader, none) > > FAIL: Build pr22393-2

[Bug binutils/25644] binutils source package missing binutils.info file

2020-03-08 Thread psmith at gnu dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25644 --- Comment #2 from psmith at gnu dot org --- Hm. I searched for "binutils.info" in bugzilla before filing my bug but nothing showed up... thanks for the link. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/25617] ld should reconstruct dynamic symbol table from PT_DYNAMIC when there is no section header

2020-03-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #33 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Kaylee from comment #31) > Yep, I'm not getting the warning with the new version. > > Also the test case that I mentioned failed appears to be > ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr17618.d, which I think is

[Bug binutils/25491] binutils 2.34 tarball requires makeinfo

2020-03-08 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25491 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||psmith at gnu dot org --- Comment #6

[Bug binutils/25644] binutils source package missing binutils.info file

2020-03-08 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25644 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug binutils/25644] New: binutils source package missing binutils.info file

2020-03-08 Thread psmith at gnu dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25644 Bug ID: 25644 Summary: binutils source package missing binutils.info file Product: binutils Version: 2.34 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: