[Bug libctf/25155] libctf directory doesn't compile with MinGW

2020-01-04 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25155 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The gdb-9-branch branch has been updated by Joel Brobecker : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=84baa6a51500a6e6faf422ab12f61c5c9857cfd0 commit 84baa6a51500a6e6faf

[Bug libctf/25155] libctf directory doesn't compile with MinGW

2020-01-04 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25155 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Joel Brobecker : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3a657c600bde2d3bd84870f75968622bbdb69ce8 commit 3a657c600bde2d3bd84870f75

[Bug ld/25327] FAIL: Run pr20276

2020-01-04 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25327 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2020-01-04 3:56 p.m., dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25327 > > --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- > On 2020-01-03 6:33

[Bug ld/25327] FAIL: Run pr20276

2020-01-04 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25327 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2020-01-03 6:33 a.m., nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > Please could you try out the attached patch and let me know if it works ? Hi Nick, The patch resolves the fail. Happy New Year, Dave

[Bug ld/25326] FAIL: Run pr19579

2020-01-04 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25326 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2020-01-03 6:41 a.m., nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > Please can you try out the attached patch and let me know if it solves the > problem ? Yes, it resolves the failure. Happy New Year

[Bug ld/25315] `__tcf_0' referenced in section `.rodata._ZNK6common26ChainResidueAtomDescriptor3strB5cxx11Ev.cst4' of mode_query_balls_distances.o: defined in discarded section `.text.__tcf_0[_ZNK6com

2020-01-04 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25315 --- Comment #17 from John David Anglin --- Links: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279824&root=gcc&view=rev https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279823&root=gcc&view=rev -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/25316] ia64 ld fails to convert binary into elf: "failed to merge target specific data"

2020-01-04 Thread slyfox at inbox dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25316 --- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Was pushed as https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=b26a3d5827edcb942b3af5b921bf317bbc0c8e83 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug binutils/25344] z80 disassembler recursion

2020-01-04 Thread sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25344 --- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov --- You are right. 0x40, 0x49, 0x52 and 0x5b are ez80 opcode prefixes which changes memory model of next instruction. 0x40 + 0x40 is impossible opcode. I will fix it soon (within a week). You may try fix i

[Bug binutils/25344] z80 disassembler recursion

2020-01-04 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25344 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target||z80-coff CC|

[Bug binutils/25344] New: z80 disassembler recursion

2020-01-04 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25344 Bug ID: 25344 Summary: z80 disassembler recursion Product: binutils Version: 2.34 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils