https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25181
--- Comment #3 from Yiting Wang ---
I've not figured out how to send a proper patch to binutils mailing list.
github is much easier. See https://github.com/riscv/riscv-binutils-gdb/pull/185
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25181
--- Comment #2 from Yiting Wang ---
I have a fix locally which changes the common ld/ldlang.c. I can post to
binutils mailing list for review.
I am not sure whether there is a possibility of a similar problem occurring
*between* passes instea
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25181
--- Comment #1 from Yiting Wang ---
Created attachment 12070
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12070&action=edit
test case
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25181
Bug ID: 25181
Summary: RISC-V: Linker relaxation may fail if there are
R_RISCV_ALIGN type relocations
Product: binutils
Version: 2.32
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25179
--- Comment #8 from Valery Ushakov ---
Why? I do know about W^X and everything, but why does the linker care?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25179
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab ---
Remove the writable bit.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25180
Bug ID: 25180
Summary: Slowness in cplus_demangle()
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binuti
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25179
--- Comment #6 from Valery Ushakov ---
Change that .data to
.section ".forth", "awx", @progbits
and the bug still happens.
(IIRC, PPC doesn't have separate "executable" permission in the MMU, so
"can read" implies "can execute" and so abu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25179
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab ---
But then, it doesn't make much sense to put code in a non-executable section.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25179
--- Comment #4 from Valery Ushakov ---
Yes, ld.so can be changed to resolve them, but they can and should be
resolved at link time. They are resolved at link time for text. In
older versions they were always resolved for data too. Now they
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25179
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
FWIW, on ppc-linux the dynamic linker can handle these relocations.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25179
--- Comment #2 from Valery Ushakov ---
I managed to misedit the original submission and sent it too early it
seems. Sorry.
$ cc ha.S && ./a.out
./a.out: Unsupported relocation type 6 in non-PLT relocations
where the error message is printe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25179
--- Comment #1 from Valery Ushakov ---
I see this on NetBSD/macppc 8-stable with
$ ld --version
GNU ld (NetBSD Binutils nb1) 2.27
and current with
$ ld --version
GNU ld (NetBSD Binutils nb1) 2.31.1
This used to work before I've upgraded f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25179
Bug ID: 25179
Summary: ld fails to resolve R_PPC_ADDR16_HA relocations in the
.data section
Product: binutils
Version: 2.31
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: min
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13390
--- Comment #1 from Valery Ushakov ---
This was fixed in ac99436572d903781c124fa3cc72d83360202b76 in 2015.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 matches
Mail list logo
