[Bug binutils/4499] assign file positions assumes segment offsets increasing

2019-10-24 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4499 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/4499] assign file positions assumes segment offsets increasing

2019-10-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4499 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=30fe183248b2523ecff9da36853e2f893c4c4b91 commit 30fe183248b2523ecff9da36853e2f

[Bug binutils/4499] assign file positions assumes segment offsets increasing

2019-10-24 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4499 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

Fyi: this list, bug-binutils, just had it's subject [tag] and footer removed

2019-10-24 Thread sysadmin
The Free Software Foundation has changed the GNU Mailman settings on this list. The short version is that any subject prefix or message footer has been removed, allowing us to turn off DMARC from munging. Any list administrator for this list is free to change these settings back, instructions are b

[Bug binutils/25070] SEGV in function _bfd_dwarf2_find_nearest_line

2019-10-24 Thread trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25070 --- Comment #7 from Trupti Pardeshi --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #6) > (In reply to Trupti Pardeshi from comment #5) > Hi Trupti, > > > May I know if Binutils-2.31 is also affected and requires this fix? Any > > heads up will b

[Bug binutils/25070] SEGV in function _bfd_dwarf2_find_nearest_line

2019-10-24 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25070 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug binutils/25120] Portability issues in binutils 2.33 due to libctf

2019-10-24 Thread nick.alcock at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25120 --- Comment #8 from Nick Alcock --- Nice diagnosis! Looks like there are some bugs in busybox and tcc to fix. I agree that the first three things you reported are bugs, and I'll fix them once I get a spare moment. Thanks for the report! -- Y

[Bug binutils/25078] stack overflow in function find_abstract_instance

2019-10-24 Thread trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25078 --- Comment #6 from Trupti Pardeshi --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #5) > (In reply to Trupti Pardeshi from comment #4) > Hi Trupti, > > > May I know if Binutils-2.31 is also affected and requires this fix? > > Yes. The 2.32 and

[Bug binutils/25078] stack overflow in function find_abstract_instance

2019-10-24 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25078 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #5