https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16794
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16794
--- Comment #10 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 11986
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11986&action=edit
possible fix
It's a long time since I maintained x86 binutils, but this untested patch will
likely fix the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16794
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16794
--- Comment #8 from Ryan Prichard ---
> In a string merge section, sym+offset is valid only for offset within the
> string at sym.
The GNU assembler is apparently willing to use section+offset to identify a
mergeable string for some relocati
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24991
Mikulas Patocka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux-gnueabihf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24991
Bug ID: 24991
Summary: the assembler generates incorrect offset for jumps on
arm thumb2
Product: binutils
Version: 2.32
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24983
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24982
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24982
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8063ab7e37c1a2abfa272d10e8d2c7ae192b1787
commit 8063ab7e37c1a2abfa272d10e8d
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24907
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24907
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=aebcfb76fc165795e67917cb67cf985c4dfdc577
commit aebcfb76fc165795e67917cb67c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24984
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
Yes, perhaps objcopy should be changed for no contents sections. The place to
look, if you're interested, is setup_section.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24984
--- Comment #4 from Grzegorz Antoniak ---
Okay, I understand that ".bss" has a non-zero virtual size, and a zero physical
size (that means, there is no file data inside the file for this section).
But when I mark ".CustomData" as no-content,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24984
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
(In reply to Grzegorz Antoniak from comment #2)
> But if I won't specify contents, so I indicate the section has no contents,
> shouldn't the section size be zero?
No. An example of a section without conten
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24984
--- Comment #2 from Grzegorz Antoniak ---
Well, lack of documentation for those section flags doesn't help with using
them properly.
Adding 'contents' to section flags indeed copies the file's contents to the
object file, and resolves my prob
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24984
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24984
Bug ID: 24984
Summary: Objcopy -I binary --rename-section reserves space for
input file, but doesn't include file's contents in .o
file
Product: binutils
Versi
17 matches
Mail list logo
