https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24144
--- Comment #9 from Paul Koning ---
Thanks, that cures my test case and in fact makes 14 fewer failures in the gcc
test suite.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> >
> > Not regression. They are LTO bug fixes.
>
> Can you be please more concrete?
Check PR 23958, PR 23818, PR 23309, PR 22983, PR 22751, PR 22502,
PR 0, PR
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dave.korn.cygwin at gmail dot
com,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > > > Does it happen on Linux?
> >
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > > Does it happen on Linux?
> >
> > No, it's specific to w64-mingw32 target.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > Does it happen on Linux?
>
> No, it's specific to w64-mingw32 target. I'm testing that on Linux where I
> use cross compile
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24258
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson ---
On 2/25/19 4:32 AM, sudi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24258
>
> --- Comment #1 from Sudakshina Das ---
> Hi Richard
>
> As far as I can see, frintts is
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--
You are rece
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> Does it happen on Linux?
No, it's specific to w64-mingw32 target. I'm testing that on Linux where I use
cross compiler + wine:
$ wine --version
wine-4.1
--
You ar
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24235
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mgcho.minic at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24266
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24220
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ld discard a symbol with|ld discards a symbol with
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--
You are re
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
Bug ID: 24267
Summary: ld discard a symbol with -flto and -static
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24220
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
yes, this is seen with gdb 8.2.1. Backporting that patch to gdb solves the
issue and gdb is able to read both the unfixed and fixed compressed debug
sections.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24258
--- Comment #1 from Sudakshina Das ---
Hi Richard
As far as I can see, frintts is not on optional feature on Armv8.5-A and thus I
don't believe a command line argument is needed, unless I missed something.
Sudi
--
You are receiving this ma
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24265
Martin Richtarsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s at martinien dot de
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24266
Bug ID: 24266
Summary: Heap out-of-bound read in
pex64_bfd_print_pdata_section
Product: binutils
Version: 2.32
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24265
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Di Monaco ---
Hi,
I've enclosed two patches that fixes the issue. They have been tested in our
environment and no issues have been encountered so far.
The only problem left is the version. We didn't find a way to
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24265
--- Comment #2 from Antonio Di Monaco ---
Created attachment 11643
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11643&action=edit
gdb patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24265
--- Comment #1 from Antonio Di Monaco ---
Created attachment 11642
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11642&action=edit
dwp tool patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24265
Bug ID: 24265
Summary: 64-bit offset/size values in dwp files are not
supported by dwp/gdb
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
24 matches
Mail list logo
