[Bug binutils/24220] [2.32 Regression] gdb cannot read read separate debug info generated by binutils 2.32

2019-02-13 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24220 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose --- hmm, this works with a gdb built from the trunk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-

[Bug binutils/24220] New: [2.32 Regression] gdb cannot read read separate debug info generated by binutils 2.32

2019-02-13 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24220 Bug ID: 24220 Summary: [2.32 Regression] gdb cannot read read separate debug info generated by binutils 2.32 Product: binutils Version: 2.32 Status: NEW Seve

[Bug binutils/24220] [2.32 Regression] gdb cannot read read separate debug info generated by binutils 2.32

2019-02-13 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24220 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose --- Created attachment 11607 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11607&action=edit binary and separate debuginfo (2.31.1) works when linked with binutils 2.31.1. -- You are receiving th

[Bug ld/24151] Regression about copy relocation of protected data

2019-02-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24151 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at debian dot org --- Comment #6 from

[Bug ld/24218] [2.32 Regression] ld.bfd fails to link shared library built by clang (x86_64)

2019-02-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24218 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/24218] [2.32 Regression] ld.bfd fails to link shared library built by clang (x86_64)

2019-02-13 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24218 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose --- LLVM issue? https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26580 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing l

[Bug ld/24218] [2.32 Regression] ld.bfd fails to link shared library built by clang (x86_64)

2019-02-13 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24218 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu CC|

[Bug ld/24218] New: [2.32 Regression] ld.bfd fails to link shared library built by clang (x86_64)

2019-02-13 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24218 Bug ID: 24218 Summary: [2.32 Regression] ld.bfd fails to link shared library built by clang (x86_64) Product: binutils Version: 2.32 Status: NEW Severity: no

Re: How create small binaries with GNU binutils.

2019-02-13 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Dmitry, > Thank you for suggestion, but map did not reveal anything. The only part > (section?) with non zero size is .text of size 0xd (=13). This is > correct, raw instructions are really 13 bytes (according to `objdump -d'). > By the way, `readelf --sections' reports, that there is no secti

Re: How create small binaries with GNU binutils.

2019-02-13 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-02-07 15:43] Nick Clifton > > part text/plain 498 > Hi Dmitry, > > >>> Still, even this way, 400 bytes is more then twice as big, compared to > >>> fasm. Any suggestions, how to shrink binary futher? > > > Thank you for suggestion. Tried both options; no difference --