https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23470
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to A. Wilcox from comment #7)
> What is the best way to provide you with all linker input? I could make a
> full tarball of the builder chroot, but it would be many gigabytes, even
> compressed. The
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23470
--- Comment #7 from A. Wilcox ---
What is the best way to provide you with all linker input? I could make a full
tarball of the builder chroot, but it would be many gigabytes, even compressed.
The issue is, after all, trying to link nearly 4
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23169
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_31-branch branch has been updated by Roland McGrath
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=feaed904944b4c07c1335b81f0fc27b5988e33c8
commit feaed904944
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23463
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
Hi Nick,
On 2018-08-01 5:02 AM, nickc at redhat dot com wrote:
>I have applied the obvious fix to the pr12982 test for the HPPA target.
The fix didn't work:
Executing on host: sh -c {gcc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23471
--- Comment #6 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
I have filed #86820 now: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86820
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23471
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resoluti
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23471
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23463
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23463
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e30985fa2b495a6b932e1376f287cb51252572d7
commit e30985fa2b495a6b932e1376f28
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23471
--- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
I have narrowed it down to being a compiler bug. The problem shows with
binutils built with gcc-8. Building the same version with gcc-7 makes the
problem go away and strip works correctly again
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14480
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14480
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3cf2b6691cef024f7cdb48aaec5fab5189e1cffa
commit 3cf2b6691cef024f7cdb48aaec5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23460
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=103da91bc083f94769e3758175a96d06cef1f8fe
commit 103da91bc083f94769e3758175a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23460
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23470
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
I meant "is not as useful"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23470
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23470
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to A. Wilcox from comment #3)
> Same result/output using that tree, though it seems to segfault more
> reliably now (instead of just quitting with Memory exhausted).
If you can provide ALL linker inpu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23471
--- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Here's the strace output for when strip fails:
execve("/usr/bin/strip", ["strip", "json2yaml"], 0xefc34d4c /* 18 vars */) = 0
brk(NULL) = 0x80024000
uname({sysnam
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23471
--- Comment #1 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
This shows the regression:
Version 2.31.1-2 in Debian:
(sid-m68k-sbuild)root@nofan:/tmp# strip json2yaml
/usr/bin/strip:json2yaml: memory exhausted
(sid-m68k-sbuild)root@nofan:/tmp#
Downgra
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23471
Bug ID: 23471
Summary: [2.31.1, regression] /usr/bin/objcopy: memory
exhausted on m68k
Product: binutils
Version: 2.31
URL: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.p
20 matches
Mail list logo
