https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23350
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(I
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22762
Martin Storsjö changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin at martin dot st
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23350
--- Comment #4 from zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net ---
What difference does it make? This is undefined behavior. It doesn't link
-fno-lto either.
gcc -c main.i && gcc -c lib.i && ar rusc lib.a lib.o
gcc main.o lib.a lib.a
/usr/bin/l
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|hjl at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23389
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > How are separate debuginfo files are encoded in the executable?
>
> Ah - there are three different ways
>
> 1. In a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_31-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=fa1b3193c52c319469f688b863d90274d3db4ccf
commit fa1b3193c52c319469
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23389
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> How are separate debuginfo files are encoded in the executable?
Ah - there are three different ways
1. In a .gnu.debuglink section
2. In a .gnu.altdebuglin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23350
Martin Liska changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=872899f1efeda1e93ed569d322c6b2ee85ce885c
commit 872899f1efeda1e93ed569d322c6b2ee
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose ---
on x86_64-linux-gnu:
$ ls -l /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1808440 Jul 7 16:34 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.27.so
on i686-linux-gnu (x86_64-linux-gnu multilib)
$ ls -l /lib
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.31
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
I am
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23389
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23372
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Version|2.32 (HEAD)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23372
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_31-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f6becb01a7532bc0263ad9e0c9e59975c38db269
commit f6becb01a7532bc026
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
I can't reproduce it. With glibc 2.28, I got
[hjl@gnu-skx-1 tools-build]$ du -sh glibc/release glibc-x32/release
glibc-32bit/release
141Mglibc/release
120Mglibc-x32/release
114Mglibc-32bit/release
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
I'm wondering why this is only seen for the non-default multilibs on
i686-linux-gnu.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23389
Bug ID: 23389
Summary: Have objdump and addr2line retrieve symbols from
separate debuginfo files
Product: binutils
Version: 2.32 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux-gnu,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23388
Bug ID: 23388
Summary: [2.31 Regression] produces large 64-bit multilib
libraries on i386
Product: binutils
Version: 2.31
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
21 matches
Mail list logo
