https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23310
--- Comment #7 from Cary Coutant ---
>> I can port the relevant parts
>> over to trunk, and add the new .file directive.
>
> That would be much appreciated - thank you.
>
> Do you want me to delay the 2.31 branch for this ?
I've still got a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23324
--- Comment #1 from zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net ---
It appears this issue has been around longer - since the commit that this bit
was introduced
http://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=78984959cb385388
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23310
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #5)
> I can port the relevant parts
> over to trunk, and add the new .file directive.
That would be much appreciated - thank you.
Do you want me to delay the 2.31
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22914
--- Comment #1 from Cary Coutant ---
HJ,
The linux-abi document leaves a few things unspecified:
- Is the .note.gnu.property section SHF_ALLOC or not?
- Does it go in the PT_NOTE segment? Should it be placed at the
beginning of the segment?
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23310
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com
As
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23271
sourceware at eckner dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sourceware at eckner dot
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23324
Bug ID: 23324
Summary: Regression: R_X86_64_converted_reloc_bit left in
linker output with -q
Product: binutils
Version: 2.31 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
