[Bug binutils/23199] Phobos static lib not build properly anymore after update to binutils 2.30 on NixOS

2018-05-17 Thread thomas.mader at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23199 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Mader --- The problematic static phobos lib can be found under https://drive.google.com/file/d/179Nvnk7D3YLO5iQ3-zNAJl-7TDHw_twU/view?usp=sharing It was too big to attach directly. -- You are receiving this mail be

[Bug binutils/23199] New: Phobos static lib not build properly anymore after update to binutils 2.30 on NixOS

2018-05-17 Thread thomas.mader at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23199 Bug ID: 23199 Summary: Phobos static lib not build properly anymore after update to binutils 2.30 on NixOS Product: binutils Version: 2.30 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/23189] bad symbol index: ffffffff

2018-05-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23189 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- A patch is posted at https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-05/msg00182.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-bi

[Bug ld/23189] bad symbol index: ffffffff

2018-05-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23189 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ld/23194] Building glibc 2.27 on 32-bit Intel with binutils 2.30 segfaults in elf subdir

2018-05-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ld/23189] bad symbol index: ffffffff

2018-05-17 Thread pangbw at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23189 --- Comment #3 from Baoshan --- I checked a little bit of the code, what I see for this issue the difference between 2.29 and 2.30 is that: For 2.29 the checking if a symbol is hidden is before the calling of function elf_x86_64_convert_load_r

[Bug ld/23189] bad symbol index: ffffffff

2018-05-17 Thread pangbw at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23189 --- Comment #2 from Baoshan --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > Hi Baoshan, > > I cannot reproduce this problem using today's mainline development > sources. Please could you check and see if the problem still exists > for

[Bug ld/23078] Weak alias to a weak symbol is not resolved correctly.

2018-05-17 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23078 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug ld/23189] bad symbol index: ffffffff

2018-05-17 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23189 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug binutils/23107] 'ar t' doesn't display object file offsets

2018-05-17 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23107 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug ld/23195] [AArch64] ld-aarch64/ifunc-9 failing

2018-05-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23195 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Sudakshina Das from comment #0) > > I have observed the following failure on aarch64-none-linux-gnu > > succeeded with: <>, expected: <.*dynamic STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol `foo' with > pointer equality

[Bug ld/23195] [AArch64] ld-aarch64/ifunc-9 failing

2018-05-17 Thread vidyapraveen at arm dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23195 Vidya Praveen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,

[Bug ld/23195] [AArch64] ld-aarch64/ifunc-9 failing

2018-05-17 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23195 Sudakshina Das changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64-none-linux-gnu -- You are r

[Bug ld/23195] New: [AArch64] ld-aarch64/ifunc-9 failing

2018-05-17 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23195 Bug ID: 23195 Summary: [AArch64] ld-aarch64/ifunc-9 failing Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld

[Bug ld/23194] Building glibc 2.27 on 32-bit Intel with binutils 2.30 segfaults in elf subdir

2018-05-17 Thread mail at andreasbaumann dot cc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194 Andreas Baumann changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i686|i686-pc-linux-gnu Hos

[Bug ld/23194] Building glibc 2.27 on 32-bit Intel with binutils 2.30 segfaults in elf subdir

2018-05-17 Thread mail at andreasbaumann dot cc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194 Andreas Baumann changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i686 -- You are receiving this mai

[Bug ld/23194] New: Building glibc 2.27 on 32-bit Intel with binutils 2.30 segfaults in elf subdir

2018-05-17 Thread mail at andreasbaumann dot cc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23194 Bug ID: 23194 Summary: Building glibc 2.27 on 32-bit Intel with binutils 2.30 segfaults in elf subdir Product: binutils Version: 2.30 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug binutils/18616] oprofile fails with "BFD: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '64617', this reader only handles version 2, 3 and 4 information"

2018-05-17 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18616 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #9 f