https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23155
Paul Pluzhnikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23155
Alec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alec.theriault at gmail dot com
--
You are re
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23155
Bug ID: 23155
Summary: internal error in set_info_section
Product: binutils
Version: 2.30
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gold
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15861
Alec changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alec.theriault at gmail dot com
--
You are re
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23154
--- Comment #5 from Baoshan ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #4)
> That's the point of the warning, an operand written as register but isn't
> one.
Is there any place/document I can check that's saying %r0 can not be used in
this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23154
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23154
Baoshan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23154
--- Comment #2 from Baoshan ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1)
> For the second line, the second operand is not a register but the constant 0
> (equivalent to lis %r5,2).
Do you mean even it is written as %r0 it is treated as co
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23154
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23154
Baoshan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pangbw at gmail dot com
--
You are receivi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23154
Bug ID: 23154
Summary: invalid register expression
Product: binutils
Version: 2.30
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23153
Bug ID: 23153
Summary: gas: distinct input and output files are not properly
detected on not-fully-emulated POSIX platforms
Product: binutils
Version: 2.31 (HEAD)
Stat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22069
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=60cb2c8a331ed8e4ad20afc51f9cdb3d8d18a869
commit 60cb2c8a331ed8e4ad20afc51f9cd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21878
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21877
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21880
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22069
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
18 matches
Mail list logo