[Bug binutils/22782] New: ld.bfd large static binaries

2018-02-03 Thread felix-glibc at fefe dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22782 Bug ID: 22782 Summary: ld.bfd large static binaries Product: binutils Version: 2.30 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils

[Bug gold/22776] internal error in dwarf_reader.cc

2018-02-03 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22776 --- Comment #11 from Cary Coutant --- Backported to the 2.30 branch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org h

[Bug gold/22776] internal error in dwarf_reader.cc

2018-02-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22776 --- Comment #10 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_30-branch branch has been updated by Cary Coutant : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=eec4607fc52840645df9f4414383b735f997685e commit eec4607fc528

[Bug ld/22762] missing static variable constructor calls

2018-02-03 Thread ssbssa at yahoo dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22762 --- Comment #12 from Hannes Domani --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #9) > Well I have been wracking my brains for a couple of days now, and I cannot > think of a better solution either. You first suggested this: > This would imply th

[Bug ld/22762] missing static variable constructor calls

2018-02-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22762 --- Comment #10 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b0daac83d78c82f7998287bb717063c4d01d4f97 commit b0daac83d78c82f7998287bb71

[Bug ld/22762] missing static variable constructor calls

2018-02-03 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22762 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/22762] missing static variable constructor calls

2018-02-03 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22762 --- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Hannes, > But I've just removed the PROVIDE()'s to make it work again, that's good > enough as a workaround for me. Well I have been wracking my brains for a couple of days now, and I cannot think of a

[Bug ld/22764] [2.30 Regression] ld fails to link 4.13 and 4.15 kernels on aarch64-linux-gnu

2018-02-03 Thread egeyar.bagcioglu at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22764 Egeyar Bagcioglu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egeyar.bagcioglu at oracle dot com