[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section

2018-01-09 Thread John.Ericson at Obsidian dot Systems
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 John Ericson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||John.Ericson at Obsidian dot Syste

[Bug gas/22598] [RISCV] No way to disable two-instruction sequences for branch or relocation for jal instructions

2018-01-09 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22598 --- Comment #8 from Jim Wilson --- Branches work the same way on RISC-V as they do on MIPS. Here is a mips example to show that. rohan:2123$ cat tmp.s _start: .skip 4096 beq $6, $7, 100 bne $4, $5, 4096 .skip

[Bug ld/22689] New: ld assertion failure on MIPS

2018-01-09 Thread coypu at sdf dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22689 Bug ID: 22689 Summary: ld assertion failure on MIPS Product: binutils Version: 2.30 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: ld

[Bug ld/13352] microblaze linker relocation bug: R_MICROBLAZE_64_NONE

2018-01-09 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13352 --- Comment #3 from wbx at openadk dot org --- sorry for the spam, bugzilla took me to next bug and I didn't see it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ b

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-09 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #16 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Created attachment 10725 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10725&action=edit regression introduced by patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list f

[Bug ld/13352] microblaze linker relocation bug: R_MICROBLAZE_64_NONE

2018-01-09 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13352 wbx at openadk dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wbx at openadk dot org --- Co

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-09 Thread wbx at openadk dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #15 from wbx at openadk dot org --- Hi Nick, I just rebuild binutils with the patch and the testcase compiled. But afterwards I have done a complete rebuild of toolchain and base system and attached regression appeared (double chec

[Bug gas/22598] [RISCV] No way to disable two-instruction sequences for branch or relocation for jal instructions

2018-01-09 Thread asb at lowrisc dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22598 --- Comment #7 from Alex Bradbury --- I would have personally expected jal to take a multiple of two bytes in the range [-1048576, 1048574], branches to take multiple of two bytes in [-4096, 4094] and so on. That would seem consistent with th

Re: Translatable strings not marked 'c-format'

2018-01-09 Thread Ask Hjorth Larsen
Hi Nick, 2018-01-09 16:46 GMT+01:00 Nick Clifton : > Hi Ask, > >> To solve this problem, BFD should either use only the formatting codes >> of printf (translation errors will be detected automatically) or avoid >> exposing any strings with %A and %B to translators. > > I just wanted to let you kno

Re: Translatable strings not marked 'c-format'

2018-01-09 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Ask, > To solve this problem, BFD should either use only the formatting codes > of printf (translation errors will be detected automatically) or avoid > exposing any strings with %A and %B to translators. I just wanted to let you know that your email has not been ignored. I do have a plan to

[Bug ld/13391] .rofixup section size mismatch

2018-01-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391 --- Comment #14 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 10723 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10723&action=edit Proposed patch Hi Waldemar, Please try out this patch and let me know if it works for you. Cheers N