[Bug ld/22267] ld.bfd does not accept "foo = ~0xFF" in linker script but accepts "foo = ~ 0xFF"

2017-10-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22267 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 f

[Bug gold/22268] ld.gold accepts "foo = ~0xFF" in linker script while ld.bfd - not.

2017-10-06 Thread rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22268 Rafael Ávila de Espíndola changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rafael.espindola at gmail

[Bug ld/22267] ld.bfd does not accept "foo = ~0xFF" in linker script but accepts "foo = ~ 0xFF"

2017-10-06 Thread rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22267 Rafael Ávila de Espíndola changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rafael.espindola at gmail

[Bug binutils/22249] objdump --dwarf-start can be very slow

2017-10-06 Thread tromey at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22249 --- Comment #1 from Tom Tromey --- I think it's as easy as: diff --git a/binutils/dwarf.c b/binutils/dwarf.c index 7ded1bf..f9c93ae 100644 --- a/binutils/dwarf.c +++ b/binutils/dwarf.c @@ -2666,6 +2666,13 @@ process_debug_info (struct dwarf_s

[Bug ld/22269] Undefined weak symbols isn't resolved to 0 in static PIE

2017-10-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22269 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- elfxx-x86.h has /* Is a undefined weak symbol which is resolved to 0. Reference to an undefined weak symbol is resolved to 0 when building executable if it isn't dynamic and 1. Has non-GOT/non-PLT rel

[Bug ld/22269] Undefined weak symbols isn't resolved to 0 in static PIE

2017-10-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22269 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from

[Bug ld/22269] Undefined weak symbols isn't resolved to 0 in static PIE

2017-10-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22269 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64 |aarch64, tilepro,ppc --- Comment #1 from H.

[Bug ld/19636] -pie changes program behavior and generate unnecessary dynamic symbols.

2017-10-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19636 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||22269 Referenced Bugs: https://sourceware

[Bug ld/22269] New: Undefined weak symbols isn't resolved to 0 in static PIE

2017-10-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22269 Bug ID: 22269 Summary: Undefined weak symbols isn't resolved to 0 in static PIE Product: binutils Version: 2.30 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug ld/22267] ld.bfd does not accept "foo = ~0xFF" in linker script but accepts "foo = ~ 0xFF"

2017-10-06 Thread georgerim at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22267 --- Comment #1 from georgerim at gmail dot com --- Bug for ld.gold posted here: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22268 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gold/22268] New: ld.gold accepts "foo = ~0xFF" in linker script while ld.bfd - not.

2017-10-06 Thread georgerim at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22268 Bug ID: 22268 Summary: ld.gold accepts "foo = ~0xFF" in linker script while ld.bfd - not. Product: binutils Version: 2.30 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug ld/22267] New: ld.bfd does not accept "foo = ~0xFF" in linker script but accepts "foo = ~ 0xFF"

2017-10-06 Thread georgerim at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22267 Bug ID: 22267 Summary: ld.bfd does not accept "foo = ~0xFF" in linker script but accepts "foo = ~ 0xFF" Product: binutils Version: 2.30 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED