https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21943
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=98c5dfc99444094652c2f2259126f70e5cacf56f
commit 98c5dfc99444094652c2f2259126f70e
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21943
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21884
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21884
--- Comment #31 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_29-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4a1c35c0165f9cbcc63d3af93574b2f6c4544eb7
commit 4a1c35c0165f9cbcc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21884
--- Comment #30 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9593aade74f0da0c08a4ab55e4c59173b07b1f63
commit 9593aade74f0da0c08a4ab55e4c5917
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21667
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21667
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=76db0a2e171d2c6780e0388840e3a10ffe7e9ee2
commit 76db0a2e171d2c6780e0388840e3a10f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21884
--- Comment #29 from Michael Matz ---
And commit b7a18930 from Nick fixed it on master for a x86_64 hosted binutils
(I'm qualifying this because I haven't checked a i586 hosted binutils yet).
So at the very minimum this patch needs to be on t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21884
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21931
--- Comment #2 from marc.balem...@c-s.fr ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1)
> I'm not sure why you think this is a binutils issue. You said adding
> "-Wl,lc" (was that supposed to be "-Wl,-lc"?) resulted in a working
> executable, wh
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21943
Yao Qi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--
You are receiving th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21943
Bug ID: 21943
Summary: Memory leak in asymbol.name
Product: binutils
Version: 2.30 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21931
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
13 matches
Mail list logo