https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21884
--- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=2e9246e077cdbbff0a56a810c5750cc895382ba3
commit 2e9246e077cdbbff0a56a810c575
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21894
Bug ID: 21894
Summary: gdb-index fails to parse debug_ranges base address
specifiers in 32 bit address files
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21884
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.30
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
Fixed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21884
--- Comment #10 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_29-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a388b7afeffad6411686d39dc1c62294da48a814
commit a388b7afeffad6411
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21884
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=db99ecc08f5b66fbe9cb72e90352c7f77ec71a6e
commit db99ecc08f5b66fbe9cb72e90352c7f7
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21884
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi H.J.,
> I prefer a different patch in comment 5, which also includes a testcase.
> There is no need to check ELF section header at all if output isn't ELF.
That makes sense. I have approved your patch
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21884
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #4)
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Thanks for reporting this problem. I have checked in a patch to fix the
> issue - the orphan section placement code was assuming that it was
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21884
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 10310
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10310&action=edit
A patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21702
--- Comment #8 from Martin Schulze ---
I'll keep my eyes open. Thanks for the fast solution.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing lis
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21702
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21702
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=70b0cf90bc6c071895b989666bcf3e6eca7b99ce
commit 70b0cf90bc6c071895b989666bc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21884
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21884
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ddff3d84be42fa80c2c9aaa635f2b9269e74e4f9
commit ddff3d84be42fa80c2c9aaa635f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21884
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
[hjl@gnu-tools-1 pr21884]$ cat x.t
OUTPUT_FORMAT("binary")
ENTRY(_main);
SECTIONS {
. = 0;
.setup : { *(.setup) }
}
[hjl@gnu-tools-1 pr21884]$ cat x.s
.text
.globl _main
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21884
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|hjl at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21702
--- Comment #5 from Martin Schulze ---
Sorry about the confusion, I see now that it was worded ambiguously.
I tried the patch and it works.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
16 matches
Mail list logo
