[Bug gold/20767] empty archive input causes "internal error in target, at ../../gold/parameters.h:105"

2016-11-09 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20767 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot de -

[Bug binutils/20801] objdump memory exhausted when trying to malloc

2016-11-09 Thread joseph.bisch at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20801 --- Comment #1 from Joseph Bisch --- Created attachment 9618 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9618&action=edit ASan output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug binutils/20801] New: objdump memory exhausted when trying to malloc

2016-11-09 Thread joseph.bisch at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20801 Bug ID: 20801 Summary: objdump memory exhausted when trying to malloc Product: binutils Version: 2.28 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug gold/20767] empty archive input causes "internal error in target, at ../../gold/parameters.h:105"

2016-11-09 Thread keno at juliacomputing dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20767 Keno Fischer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||keno at juliacomputing dot com -- You

[Bug binutils/20799] Wrong .s suffix for EVEX vpextrw

2016-11-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20799 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/20799] Wrong .s suffix for EVEX vpextrw

2016-11-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20799 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=60227d64dd9228be1a07fc7122894fc2875b1a70 commit 60227d64dd9228be1a07fc7122894fc2

[Bug ld/20800] New: BFD Linker failing (unresolvable R_X86_64_PLTOFF64) with -mcmodel=large and --start-group

2016-11-09 Thread keno at juliacomputing dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20800 Bug ID: 20800 Summary: BFD Linker failing (unresolvable R_X86_64_PLTOFF64) with -mcmodel=large and --start-group Product: binutils Version: 2.27 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/20754] 82 opcode (add Eb, Ib) wrong disassembling

2016-11-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20754 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=7766fd10024dc0587838fbc4608f3f8e30e17a26 commit 7766fd10024dc0587838fbc4608f3f8e

[Bug binutils/20799] New: Wrong .s suffix for EVEX vpextrw

2016-11-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20799 Bug ID: 20799 Summary: Wrong .s suffix for EVEX vpextrw Product: binutils Version: 2.28 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils

[Bug gas/20798] wrong opcode generated with .intel_syntax noprefix

2016-11-09 Thread SztfG at yandex dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20798 --- Comment #1 from SztfG at yandex dot ru --- to get this bytes 48 8b 04 25 10 00 00 00 I need to use mov rax, qword ptr [0x10] or mov rax, [0x10] and why I get same opcode for this two lines? mov rax, qword mov rax, 0x8 and this mov rax,

[Bug gas/20798] New: wrong opcode generated with .intel_syntax noprefix

2016-11-09 Thread SztfG at yandex dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20798 Bug ID: 20798 Summary: wrong opcode generated with .intel_syntax noprefix Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Co