[Bug binutils/20700] [libopcodes][x86] Invalid suffix for xbegin

2016-11-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20700 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/20775] dd f0 is disassebled as fnop

2016-11-07 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20775 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=48c97fa1ba7d6628352fc2433abd91a41f6c8171 commit 48c97fa1ba7d6628352fc2433abd91a4

[Bug binutils/20775] dd f0 is disassebled as fnop

2016-11-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20775 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

Re: objdump '--stop-address' option stop on a wrong ending address

2016-11-07 Thread BERBAR Florian
On 07/11/2016 21:01, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Nov 07 2016, Nick Clifton wrote: > >> Hi Florian, >> >>> I try to extract function assembly code with objdump using >>> "--start-address" and "--stop-address" options but the stop address stop >>> on the second to last address. >> >>> $ objdump --st

[Bug binutils/20755] readelf: DWARF-5 support

2016-11-07 Thread jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20755 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Jan Kra

Re: objdump '--stop-address' option stop on a wrong ending address

2016-11-07 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Nov 07 2016, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Florian, > >> I try to extract function assembly code with objdump using >> "--start-address" and "--stop-address" options but the stop address stop >> on the second to last address. > >> $ objdump --start-address=0x50c40 --stop-address=0x50c5f -d > >>

[Bug binutils/20781] e9 opcode wrong disassembling

2016-11-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20781 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/20780] e8 opcode wrong disassembling

2016-11-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20780 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/18386] callw with 0x66 prefix incorrectly disassembled in 64-bit mode

2016-11-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18386 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- *** Bug 20780 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing l

[Bug binutils/18386] callw with 0x66 prefix incorrectly disassembled in 64-bit mode

2016-11-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18386 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- *** Bug 20781 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing l

[Bug binutils/18386] callw with 0x66 prefix incorrectly disassembled in 64-bit mode

2016-11-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18386 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- *** Bug 20783 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing li

[Bug binutils/20783] FF /4 (JMP Ev) wrong disassembling

2016-11-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20783 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/18386] callw with 0x66 prefix incorrectly disassembled in 64-bit mode

2016-11-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18386 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anatolymik at gmail dot com --- Comment #8

[Bug binutils/20782] FF /2 (CALL Ev) wrong disassembling

2016-11-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20782 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: objdump '--stop-address' option stop on a wrong ending address

2016-11-07 Thread BERBAR Florian
On 07/11/2016 17:09, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Florian, Hi Nick > >> I try to extract function assembly code with objdump using >> "--start-address" and "--stop-address" options but the stop address stop >> on the second to last address. > >> $ objdump --start-address=0x50c40 --stop-address=0x50c

Re: objdump '--stop-address' option stop on a wrong ending address

2016-11-07 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Florian, > I try to extract function assembly code with objdump using > "--start-address" and "--stop-address" options but the stop address stop > on the second to last address. > $ objdump --start-address=0x50c40 --stop-address=0x50c5f -d >50c59: b8 01 00 00 00 mov$0x1,%

[Bug ld/20784] [2.28 Regression] binutils fails to link a configure test on x86_64-linux-gnu

2016-11-07 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20784 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ld/20784] [2.28 Regression] binutils fails to link a configure test on x86_64-linux-gnu

2016-11-07 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20784 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e680a6b69b4bd173a180419e973a9bf18a000151 commit e680a6b69b4bd173a180419e973

[Bug gas/20744] [PPC] Incorrect relocation for VLE-instructions

2016-11-07 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20744 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ld/20789] New: [avr] Relaxation does not correctly adjust DIFF reloc with negative value

2016-11-07 Thread saaadhu at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20789 Bug ID: 20789 Summary: [avr] Relaxation does not correctly adjust DIFF reloc with negative value Product: binutils Version: 2.28 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity:

[Bug ld/20789] [avr] Relaxation does not correctly adjust DIFF reloc with negative value

2016-11-07 Thread saaadhu at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20789 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receivi