[Bug binutils/20771] DC E0-E7 wrong opcode name

2016-11-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20771 --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 20779 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing

[Bug binutils/20779] de f8-ff wrong opcode name

2016-11-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20779 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/20771] DC E0-E7 wrong opcode name

2016-11-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20771 --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 20778 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing

[Bug binutils/20778] de f0-f7 wrong opcode name

2016-11-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20778 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/20777] de e8-ef wrong opcode name

2016-11-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20777 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/20771] DC E0-E7 wrong opcode name

2016-11-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20771 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 20777 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing

[Bug binutils/20776] de e0-e7 wrong opcode name

2016-11-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20776 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/20771] DC E0-E7 wrong opcode name

2016-11-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20771 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 20776 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing

[Bug binutils/20774] DC F8-FF wrong opcode name

2016-11-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20774 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/20771] DC E0-E7 wrong opcode name

2016-11-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20771 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 20774 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing

[Bug binutils/20773] DC F0-F7 wrong opcode name

2016-11-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20773 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/20771] DC E0-E7 wrong opcode name

2016-11-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20771 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 20773 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing

[Bug binutils/20771] DC E0-E7 wrong opcode name

2016-11-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20771 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- *** Bug 20772 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing

[Bug binutils/20772] DC E8-EF wrong opcode name

2016-11-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20772 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/20771] DC E0-E7 wrong opcode name

2016-11-06 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20771 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug gas/20785] [2.28 Regression] binutils fails to assemble power6/memset.S file in glibc

2016-11-06 Thread bergner at vnet dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20785 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tuliom at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---

[Bug gas/20785] [2.28 Regression] binutils fails to assemble power6/memset.S file in glibc

2016-11-06 Thread bergner at vnet dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20785 --- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner --- The line with the problem is: cmpli cr1,rLEN,128 Thi sis due to Alan's patch: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2016-09/msg00217.html I believe that this cmpli should be changed to cmpldi like t

[Bug gas/20785] [2.28 Regression] binutils fails to assemble power6/memset.S file in glibc

2016-11-06 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20785 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-linux-gnu,

[Bug gas/20785] New: [2.28 Regression] binutils fails to assemble power6/memset.S file in glibc

2016-11-06 Thread doko at debian dot org
Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: doko at debian dot org Target Milestone: --- seen with binutils trunk 20161106 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and powerpc-linux-gnu (the latter building a 64bit glibc

[Bug ld/20784] New: [2.28 Regression] binutils fails to link a configure test on x86_64-linux-gnu

2016-11-06 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20784 Bug ID: 20784 Summary: [2.28 Regression] binutils fails to link a configure test on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: binutils Version: 2.28 (HEAD) Status: NEW Sever

[Bug ld/20784] [2.28 Regression] binutils fails to link a configure test on x86_64-linux-gnu

2016-11-06 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20784 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu CC|

[Bug binutils/20783] New: FF /4 (JMP Ev) wrong disassembling

2016-11-06 Thread anatolymik at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20783 Bug ID: 20783 Summary: FF /4 (JMP Ev) wrong disassembling Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutil

[Bug binutils/20782] New: FF /2 (CALL Ev) wrong disassembling

2016-11-06 Thread anatolymik at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20782 Bug ID: 20782 Summary: FF /2 (CALL Ev) wrong disassembling Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binuti