https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20641
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
dcbf needs to keep its L field optional. dcbf is used in the kernel and in
glibc without L. Also tlbie and tlbiel ought to be optional, I think, because
earlier versions of these insns lacked the L field.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20608
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20608
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=2df2751d1927e1231bbe7d548139da98d6ca9b9a
commit 2df2751d1927e1231bbe7d54
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20641
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #2)
> {"tbegin.", {HTM_R}},
> {"tsr.",{L}},
>
> I'm inclined to say L should be optional when generating ppc32 code, for
> cmp* and tlbie. Not optional everywhe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20641
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
And there are quite a few other issues around L. L0 and L1 are unused so ought
to disappear. dcbf, wclr L field is 2 bits, not 1. mtsle isn't documented in
either Power ISA Version 3.0 or POWER8 UM v1.3.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20641
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20238
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20238
--- Comment #53 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e3f07b5b750554ee1bddc34bb77fd7d31eeb
commit e3f07b5b750554ee1bddc3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20238
--- Comment #52 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_27-branch branch has been updated by Cary Coutant
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a617f9ddc3e30bca79cd40f4afa90d2851260f38
commit a617f9ddc3e3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20642
Sriraman Tallam changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tmsriram at google dot com
--- Comm
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20642
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ccoutant at gmail dot com |tmsriram at google dot
com
---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20642
Bug ID: 20642
Summary: internal error in get_section_contents, at icf.cc:467
with --icf=safe
Product: binutils
Version: 2.28 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20636
--- Comment #8 from Szabolcs Nagy ---
(In reply to Szabolcs Nagy from comment #7)
> (order of objects in the archive seems to matter for some reason).
that's only because the out-of-bound reldata->hashes[2] entry happens to be 0
with some ord
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20636
--- Comment #7 from Szabolcs Nagy ---
attached the asm test cases, they are compiled from glibc sources
sysdeps/gnu/unwind-resume.c
sysdeps/arm/find_exidx.c
sysdeps/arm/aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1.c
and an archive of the resulting objects triggers
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20636
--- Comment #6 from Szabolcs Nagy ---
Created attachment 9529
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9529&action=edit
testcase asm 3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20636
--- Comment #5 from Szabolcs Nagy ---
Created attachment 9528
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9528&action=edit
testcase asm 2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20636
--- Comment #4 from Szabolcs Nagy ---
Created attachment 9527
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9527&action=edit
testcase asm 1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20636
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 9526
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9526&action=edit
Proposed patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20636
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20641
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at vnet dot ibm.com
--
You a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20634
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20634
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1c5f704fc035bc705dee887418f42cb8bca24b5d
commit 1c5f704fc035bc705dee887418f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20636
--- Comment #1 from Szabolcs Nagy ---
during bfd_elf_final_link:
bfd/elflink.c:11409 bfd_elf_final_link
first sets reldata->count to 2
bfd/elf32-arm.c:19031 elf32_arm_count_output_relocs
counts 3 output relocs
bfd/elflink.c:24
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20634
--- Comment #2 from E. G. ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1)
> Created attachment 9521 [details]
> Proposed patch
>
> Hi E.G.
>
> Without a way to reproduce this problem it might be very hard to fix. But
> first, please have a
24 matches
Mail list logo
