https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20196
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
And fixed on the 2.26 release branch too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutil
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20196
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_26-branch branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4f952ba68c8672cd921b3f4916c18ee6a1b86adb
commit 4f952ba68c86
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16794
--- Comment #2 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola ---
(In reply to Yin Ma from comment #1)
> This patch made all DWARF DW_AT_name generation are wrong for ARM. Please
> take a look again. I would like to know how LLVM need to work with gold
> link
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20196
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
Fixed. I'll commit this to the 2.26 branch soon too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20196
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=026122a670440bc51266f8e013e5c5877c19b54e
commit 026122a670440bc51266f8e013
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18386
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18386
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=07f5af7d3c635234284e7a0f7dd7a410b1628b8b
commit 07f5af7d3c635234284e7a0f7dd7a410
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20196
--- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner ---
I have a fix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20173
romain.naour at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resol
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20159
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
Su
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20173
--- Comment #4 from romain.naour at gmail dot com ---
Hi Nick,
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3)
> Hi Romain,
>
> Ha - found it. You are linking with "--fatal-warnings" specified on the
> linker command line. Hence the warnings a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16794
Yin Ma changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yinma at codeaurora dot org
--- Comment #1 f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20193
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 9316
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9316&action=edit
Proposed patch
Hi Jon,
Does this variation on your patch make a difference ?
The change is to set the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20193
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Jon,
> Unfortunately, with that patch applied, 1.exe is invalid, while 2.exe and
> 3.exe are good
:-} So close...
Question: in the 1.exe post-patch file the MinorLinkerVersion field in the COFF
header
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20193
--- Comment #5 from Jon TURNEY ---
Created attachment 9310
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9310&action=edit
Output from test case with patch applied
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20193
--- Comment #4 from Jon TURNEY ---
Created attachment 9309
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9309&action=edit
Patch to update size of resources in DataDirectory
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2)
>
> > The size
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20193
--- Comment #3 from Jon TURNEY ---
Created attachment 9308
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9308&action=edit
Output from test case
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2)
> Hi Jon,
>
> Please could upload the 1.exe,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20193
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20177
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20196
Sebastian Huber changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20196
Bug ID: 20196
Summary: Opcode regressions for e6500
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Hi Dave,
> * if foo.o is linked directly into an executable, f's ctor is run before
> "main".
> * if foo.o is linked into a .a and then that .a is linked into an
> executable,
> f's ctor may or may not be run before "main". The constructor is only run if
> there's at least one symbol in foo.
22 matches
Mail list logo