https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114
Bug ID: 20114
Summary: Partial relro support for s390x gold
Product: binutils
Version: 2.27 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: g
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20113
Bug ID: 20113
Summary: Partial relro support for s390x ld
Product: binutils
Version: 2.27 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20113
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20096
--- Comment #5 from Ecular Xu ---
Thanks for the patch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20096
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f507bebf459de9b145bd8ccfcfa2f5f6690adac4
commit f507bebf459de9b145bd8ccfcfa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20096
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
Christophe Monat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20030
--- Comment #12 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_26-branch branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ec0d6fa0d832ca4c703ba8349f525a5cf02c3972
commit ec0d6fa0d
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20100
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |MOVED
--
You are receiving this mai
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20070
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Steven Shi from comment #10)
> LLVM guys say "LTO is linker specific, clang is only forwarding the option
> to the linker here." see below discussion about "How to debug if LTO
> generate wrong cod
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20100
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20022
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #9)
> Created attachment 9274 [details]
> Revised patch
>
> Hi H.J.
>
> Of course, you are right. Plus the error message was wrong - it is not
> undefined orphan sect
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20062
--- Comment #2 from Steven Shi ---
Hello,
I'm sorry, but how's the issue going on? I really hope to try the gold linker
for my LTO build.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20022
--- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 9274
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9274&action=edit
Revised patch
Hi H.J.
Of course, you are right. Plus the error message was wrong - it is not
undefined o
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20070
--- Comment #10 from Steven Shi ---
LLVM guys say "LTO is linker specific, clang is only forwarding the option to
the linker here." see below discussion about "How to debug if LTO generate
wrong code?":
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/
15 matches
Mail list logo
