[Bug ld/19807] [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X optimization breaks linux kernel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- I will

[Bug ld/19807] [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X optimization breaks linux kernel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- [h

[Bug ld/19807] [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X optimization breaks linux kernel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 Fabian Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Fabian Vog

[Bug ld/19807] [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X optimization breaks linux kernel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9088|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ld/19807] [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X optimization breaks linux kernel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9087|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ld/19807] [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X optimization breaks linux kernel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 9087 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9087&action=edit A kernel patch Try this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug ld/19807] [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X optimization breaks linux kernel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Vogt --- I tried that but it crashed even before the decompressor. I'll have a closer look at that and report back. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug ld/19807] [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X optimization breaks linux kernel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|hjl at sourcewar

[Bug gas/19744] Thumb-1 pcrop relocations don't work on Thumb-2 targets

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19744 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Monat --- Charles, The bug is fixed from our standpoint. I don't know the transition rules applied here, but my best guess it that you, as the original reporter of the BZ, is the one who can legitimately close

[Bug gas/19744] Thumb-1 pcrop relocations don't work on Thumb-2 targets

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19744 Christophe Monat changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassi

[Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 11412

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19713 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 9086 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9086&action=edit Same patch. made against 2.25 sources Hi Dan, > All of these changes look good. Is there an easy way that

[Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 11412

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19713 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=37b01f6a13f21f274bf9758ecbf5d9efd6153444 commit 37b01f6a13f21f274bf9758ecbf

[Bug ld/19807] [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X optimization breaks linux kernel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at sourceware dot org,

[Bug ld/19807] New: [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X optimization breaks linux kernel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 Bug ID: 19807 Summary: [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X optimization breaks linux kernel Product: binutils Version: 2.27 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: critical