[Bug ld/19579] [Regression] link error linking fortran code with PIE

2016-03-03 Thread krebbel at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19579 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #13 from Andreas Kr

[Bug gold/19019] [SPARC64] Only registers %g[2367] can be declared using STT_REGISTER when linking against libsystemd

2016-03-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19019 --- Comment #21 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=dc1c8a16a38dec431c77f49cf50a9b62d6366138 commit dc1c8a16a38dec431c77f49cf5

[Bug gold/19751] Gold failed to build with GCC 6

2016-03-03 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19751 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9055|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ld/13406] version script: please allow anonymous tag to be combined with other tags

2016-03-03 Thread sbergman at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13406 --- Comment #9 from Stephan Bergmann --- (The original problem had been solved in LibreOffice with "fdo#42865: privatized unique empty string s

[Bug ld/13406] version script: please allow anonymous tag to be combined with other tags

2016-03-03 Thread lionel at mamane dot lu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13406 Lionel Elie Mamane changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sbergman at redhat dot com --- C

[Bug ld/13406] version script: please allow anonymous tag to be combined with other tags

2016-03-03 Thread lionel at mamane dot lu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13406 Lionel Elie Mamane changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #7 from Lionel E

[Bug gas/19744] Thumb-1 pcrop relocations don't work on Thumb-2 targets

2016-03-03 Thread cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19744 --- Comment #2 from cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org --- I don't have a compelling use case, other than that ARMv6-M is a subset of ARMv7-M, so it seems like users may have a reasonable expectation that their ARMv6-M code would work on ARMv7 targets