https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18855
--- Comment #8 from Cary Coutant ---
> I made a automatic test case for it (see attachment). I think the ltrans.*.s
> file in my archive are my own gcc invocation on sparc64, but the files from
> attachment 8619 [details] should do as well. Ju
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18855
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18855
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9eacb935acd69f6532135ec1353630db5111467c
commit 9eacb935acd69f6532135ec1353
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19019
--- Comment #15 from Frans van Berckel ---
Do not know it's useful for gold. This a old mail (1999) from binutils mailing
list about getting 'Support for SPARC STT_REGISTER' ...
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/1999-q3/msg00029.html
--
Yo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19019
--- Comment #16 from Jose E. Marchesi ---
Looks like davem already tried to add proper support for STT_REGISTER to gold:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-04/msg00286.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19019
--- Comment #14 from Jose E. Marchesi ---
The latest version of the psABI is
sparc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/SCD.2.4.1.pdf.gz for 64 bits, and psABI31
for 32 bits. These are old, so you can basically ignore the "experimental"
remarks. I
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19019
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davem at davemloft dot net
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10479
Gilbie Rivas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rivasgilbie121 at gmail dot com
--- Co
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10288
Gilbie Rivas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rivasgilbie121 at gmail dot com
--- Co
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19073
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
What went wrong?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.or
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19073
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19073
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ld: Segmentation fault |S/390: ld: Segmentation
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19073
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||s390x-ibm-linux
Host|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19075
Bug ID: 19075
Summary: Archive member not fetched when strong undefined
symbol found after a weak undef one
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19073
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19073
Bug ID: 19073
Summary: ld: Segmentation fault building Glibc
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
16 matches
Mail list logo