Can gold's max page size for AArch64 be updated to 64k to match current kernel capabilities?

2015-10-01 Thread Chad Rosier
When attempting to compile and run binaries using recent versions of the gold linker on AArch64 on a kernel with a 64k page granule, we observe translation faults before the programs reach main(). When these same binaries are run on a kernel with a 4k page granule, they run successfully to completi

[Bug gold/19031] R_386_PC32 does not imply a call

2015-10-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19031 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5db4f0d383e3de40e594cf05dd8f6d743233a487 commit 5db4f0d383e3de40e594cf05dd8f6d74

[Bug gold/19047] gold --icf vs REL with negative addend

2015-10-01 Thread roland at gnu dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19047 Roland McGrath changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ccoutant at gmail dot com |tmsriram at google dot com -

[Bug gold/19047] New: gold --icf vs REL with negative addend

2015-10-01 Thread roland at gnu dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19047 Bug ID: 19047 Summary: gold --icf vs REL with negative addend Product: binutils Version: 2.25 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold

[Bug gold/19031] R_386_PC32 does not imply a call

2015-10-01 Thread rafael.espindola at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19031 --- Comment #4 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola --- Created attachment 8665 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8665&action=edit x86_64 testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug gold/19041] unsupported TLSLE reloc 549/551

2015-10-01 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19041 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|ccoutant a

[Bug gold/19042] unsupported reloc 311/312

2015-10-01 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19042 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|ccoutant a

[Bug gas/14193] mov3q.l followed by movem.l generates illegal instruction on Coldfire 5480 (or -march=cfv4e)

2015-10-01 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14193 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/11030] Missing opcode for assembly instruction 'stldsr' in isa aplus of m68k assembler

2015-10-01 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11030 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/4897] [regression] failing testcases on m68k-linux-gnu

2015-10-01 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4897 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/1198] Segfault when executing objdump on a special file...

2015-10-01 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1198 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #2 from Andreas S

[Bug binutils/1298] m68k-dis.c:1348: warning: argument 'info' might be clobbered by 'longjmp' or 'vfork'

2015-10-01 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1298 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/19044] New: Gold links single-threaded program into a deadlock on i686 Linux

2015-10-01 Thread sduvan.gcc at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19044 Bug ID: 19044 Summary: Gold links single-threaded program into a deadlock on i686 Linux Product: binutils Version: 2.25 Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug binutils/18995] c++filt segfault on line not containing a symbol

2015-10-01 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18995 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ld/19030] ld generates .so/x86 with bad phdr so the Android linker won't dlopen

2015-10-01 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19030 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug gold/19041] New: unsupported TLSLE reloc 549/551

2015-10-01 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19041 Bug ID: 19041 Summary: unsupported TLSLE reloc 549/551 Product: binutils Version: 2.26 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold

[Bug gold/19042] New: unsupported reloc 311/312

2015-10-01 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19042 Bug ID: 19042 Summary: unsupported reloc 311/312 Product: binutils Version: 2.26 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold As

[Bug ld/19030] ld generates .so/x86 with bad phdr so the Android linker won't dlopen

2015-10-01 Thread winter-...@bfw-online.de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19030 --- Comment #3 from winter-...@bfw-online.de --- Even worse, the actual error is the missing dash in the beginning. "--no-enum-size-warning" *is* a ld parameter but without the first dash it behaves like "-n". -- You are receiving this mail b

[Bug ld/19030] ld generates .so/x86 with bad phdr so the Android linker won't dlopen

2015-10-01 Thread winter-...@bfw-online.de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19030 --- Comment #2 from winter-...@bfw-online.de --- Your analysis is correct, thank you. While "-nostdlib" actually is a ld option (at least in my ld according to --help and man page), I rechecked and noticed I passed another gcc parameter "-no-e

[Bug ld/19030] ld generates .so/x86 with bad phdr so the Android linker won't dlopen

2015-10-01 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19030 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ld/19013] Section corrupted with elf64-x86-64 input -> elf32-i386 output

2015-10-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19013 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=017e6bceee1a96d4b57175687560b4d625fdb150 commit 017e6bceee1a96d4b57175687560b

[Bug gold/19031] R_386_PC32 does not imply a call

2015-10-01 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19031 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Rafael Ávila de Espíndola from comment #1) > Created attachment 8653 [details] > patch I don't think it is correct. See my ld fix: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2015-09/msg00328.html -- Yo

[Bug gold/19031] R_386_PC32 does not imply a call

2015-10-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19031 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4b627c18440f51077f8fd4c18adaa3919c3a373e commit 4b627c18440f51077f8fd4c18adaa391