https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18700
--- Comment #1 from Michael Rolle ---
First off, I might be misinterpreting the Intel doc (319433-022
OCTOBER 2014), in which case gas might be doing the right thing after all.
I wrote some EVEX instructions, both scalar and vector, and both
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18700
Bug ID: 18700
Summary: Wrong code generated on i386 for instructions with
AVX-512 {sae}
Product: binutils
Version: 2.24
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18638
--- Comment #4 from Michael Rolle ---
In the first case, I got the correct results when I assembled the .s file. The
file was gas/i386/x86-64-avx-scalar.s in the gas/testsuite directory. objdump
of the resulting .o file show the correct byt
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18639
--- Comment #1 from Michael Rolle ---
Make that Bug 18638 above, not 18636.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@g
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18638
--- Comment #3 from Michael Rolle ---
In the second case, it was my mistake. I was reading the reg field as the rm
field. The rm field is in fact 100b. So there's no bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18698
Bug ID: 18698
Summary: internal error in target, at
../../binutils/gold/parameters.h:105
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18689
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18689
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f54f5e31ce1270a1e9441348d6f2ea2426352478
commit f54f5e31ce1270a1e9441348d6f2ea24
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15574
Jevin Sweval changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsweval at arxan dot com
--
You are r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15574
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15574
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c20ceeb226168ffd84078ef74d890c2b7f69a435
commit c20ceeb226168ffd84078ef74d8
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18689
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
[hjl@gnu-6 pr18689]$ cat foo.c
/* Dummy file. */
[hjl@gnu-6 pr18689]$ make
gcc -ggdb3 -Wa,--compress-debug-sections=zlib-gabi -c -o foo.o foo.c
./ld.gold -r -o x.o foo.o
./ld -r -o y.o x.o
./ld: x.o: unable t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15574
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danalbert at google dot com
--- Commen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18596
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18695
Bug ID: 18695
Summary: [x86-64] Missing relocation overflow check
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component:
15 matches
Mail list logo