https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18200
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18200
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=bdd2d2b7e6fbe90a07bd631cb599266fc6e12b5e
commit bdd2d2b7e6fbe90a07bd631cb59
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17498
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17498
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=cd3c333f43f03d6e41668a82a68a99c14000a681
commit cd3c333f43f03d6e41668a82a68
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17498
--- Comment #7 from Cary Coutant ---
> $ cat test.cpp
> void g(const char* x);
> void f() {
> g("aoeuaoeuaoeuao");
> }
> $ gcc -shared -fPIC test.cpp -o test.so -fuse-ld=bfd -O2 && nm test.so |
> grep ' r '
> 0728 r __FRAME_END_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17498
--- Comment #6 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #5)
> Testcase, please.
From the description:
$ cat test.cpp
void g(const char* x);
void f() {
g("aoeuaoeuaoeuao");
}
$ gcc -shared -fPIC test.cpp -o
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308
--- Comment #6 from dilyan.palauzov at aegee dot org ---
The right URL is
http://mail.aegee.org/dpa/bz18288/strip/opendkim-gold-2.25-unstripped .
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17498
--- Comment #5 from Cary Coutant ---
Testcase, please.
I'm not sure what you're asking for here, though. You want to make -X the
default?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17498
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17498
Rafael Ávila de Espíndola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resoluti
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17498
--- Comment #3 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #2)
> I believe this only matters because clang's integrated assembler doesn't
> discard the ".L" symbols. Ideally, all those symbols can be dropped from
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #5 from Cary Couta
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18288
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #16 from Cary Cout
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18307
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18430
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|ccoutant at gmail dot com |shenhan at google dot
com
---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18378
--- Comment #5 from Cary Coutant ---
Who should I assign this to?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
htt
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18474
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=13be46a23c97f8bdb4ac028c1498197e44fe2e62
commit 13be46a23c97f8bdb4ac028c149
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18474
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18474
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18487
Bug ID: 18487
Summary: ARM "special symbols" reported in preference to more
useful ones
Product: binutils
Version: 2.24
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
It turns out that the DJGPP (aka go32) port of binutils has been broken since
binutils 2.25 has been released. The DJGPP port of binutils 2.24 and previous
versions works flawlessly. Please note that there is nothing particular about
this port. It is simply an absolute generic 32-bit coff syste
21 matches
Mail list logo
