[Bug gas/18314] On ARM, data gets confused for instructions after ".align" directive

2015-05-13 Thread solrabizna at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18314 Solra Bizna changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/18414] TOC optimization bug (ignoring data deps on addis/ld -> nop/ld opt)

2015-05-13 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18414 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX

[Bug ld/18414] TOC optimization bug (ignoring data deps on addis/ld -> nop/ld opt)

2015-05-13 Thread hfinkel at anl dot gov
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18414 --- Comment #3 from Hal Finkel --- (In reply to Hal Finkel from comment #2) > (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1) > > True, ld will do this. However, the optimization is relying on gcc to > > generate code that can be optimized this way.

[Bug ld/18414] TOC optimization bug (ignoring data deps on addis/ld -> nop/ld opt)

2015-05-13 Thread hfinkel at anl dot gov
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18414 --- Comment #2 from Hal Finkel --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1) > True, ld will do this. However, the optimization is relying on gcc to > generate code that can be optimized this way.. So I'm assuming the example > code was from

[Bug ld/18414] TOC optimization bug (ignoring data deps on addis/ld -> nop/ld opt)

2015-05-13 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18414 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/18414] TOC optimization bug (ignoring data deps on addis/ld -> nop/ld opt)

2015-05-13 Thread hfinkel at anl dot gov
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18414 Hal Finkel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com,

[Bug ld/18414] New: TOC optimization

2015-05-13 Thread hfinkel at anl dot gov
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18414 Bug ID: 18414 Summary: TOC optimization Product: binutils Version: 2.25 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned

[Bug gas/18401] MIPS -march=xlp results in inconsistent ISA markers

2015-05-13 Thread matthew.fortune at imgtec dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18401 --- Comment #3 from Matthew Fortune --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2) > Hi Matthew, > > Will something like the uploaded patch work ? (Caveat: I am not a MIPS > expert, so there may be something that I have missed). > > Cheer

[Bug gas/18401] MIPS -march=xlp results in inconsistent ISA markers

2015-05-13 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18401 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clif

[Bug gas/18401] MIPS -march=xlp results in inconsistent ISA markers

2015-05-13 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18401 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug gas/18314] On ARM, data gets confused for instructions after ".align" directive

2015-05-13 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18314 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug gas/18390] how to tell if the dwarf line generated is for literal pools ( re bug 12974 )

2015-05-13 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18390 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug binutils/18386] callw with 0x66 prefix incorrectly disassembled in 64-bit mode

2015-05-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18386 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=31955f993de7b502b7a89bba4f9c9b0a34f90b2c commit 31955f993de7b502b7a89bba4f9c9b0a