https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17766
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17766
--- Comment #2 from Joshua Rogers ---
Is that right?
Isn't the +1 used for the terminating NUL byte?
Thanks,
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-bi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17766
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17767
--- Comment #1 from Joshua Rogers ---
This is also the case for some FILNMLEN, too.
/binutils-gdb/include/coff/internal.h
470#define FILNMLEN14 /* # characters in a file name */
vs.
/include/coff/pe.h
175#define FILNM
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17767
Bug ID: 17767
Summary: Multiple (>8) buffer overruns due to incorrect value
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
C
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17766
Bug ID: 17766
Summary: libbfd incorrect expression
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17765
Bug ID: 17765
Summary: Bad bit shift operation
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17763
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17763
Bug ID: 17763
Summary: Parser bug in comment after immediate operand
Product: binutils
Version: 2.23
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
