https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512
--- Comment #99 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
Created attachment 7947
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7947&action=edit
AFL crashers for `objdump -x`
With AFL...
Files: 3
Errors:
3 Invalid write of size ...
$ COLUMNS=80 man objdump|perl -nwle 'print if length > 155'
--dwarf[=rawline,=decodedline,=info,=abbrev,=pubnames,=aranges,=macro,=frames,=frames-interp,=str,=loc,=Ranges,=pubtypes,=trace_info,=trace_abbrev,=trace_aranges,=gdb_index]]
-a,-d,-D,-e,-f,-g,-G,-h,-H,-p,-P,-r,-R,-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14243
yuexu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yue.xu at intel dot com
Assignee|un
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512
--- Comment #98 from Hanno Boeck ---
Nick, did you see attachment 7937? Still crashes nm with latest git, this is in
the ihex parser.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17592
Evandro Menezes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||evandro at yahoo dot com
--- Commen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17619
Bug ID: 17619
Summary: Gold fails to check PC-relative offset overflow in PLT
entry
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17618
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17618
Bug ID: 17618
Summary: Linker fails to check PC-relative offset overflow in
PLT entry
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Hi,
I just ran into this error:
...
/home/vries/local/arm/obj/binutils-src-mainline-0-arm-none-linux-gnueabi-i686-pc-linux-gnu/binutils/dwarf.c:
In function 'process_extended_line_op':
/home/vries/local/arm/obj/binutils-src-mainline-0-arm-none-linux-gnueabi-i686-pc-linux-gnu/binutils/dwarf.c:419
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17605
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clif
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17605
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17605
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17592
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #5)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > When there is a large readonly section, it makes no differences between
> >
> > text, plt, readonly, got
> >
> > and
> >
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17592
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #5)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > When there is a large readonly section, it makes no differences between
> >
> > text, plt, readonly, got
> >
> > and
> >
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17592
--- Comment #5 from Michael Matz ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> When there is a large readonly section, it makes no differences between
>
> text, plt, readonly, got
>
> and
>
> text, readonly, plt, got
>
> since text needs to
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512
--- Comment #97 from Nick Clifton ---
Alright - the bugs exposed by those latest fuzzed binaries should be fixed now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512
--- Comment #96 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17592
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #3)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> > It is an interesting idea.
>
> Yeah, that's how I tested the large model back in the days when I implemented
> some of it.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17592
--- Comment #3 from Michael Matz ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> It is an interesting idea.
Yeah, that's how I tested the large model back in the days when I implemented
some of it. Never got around to actually change the PLT lay
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17531
--- Comment #35 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Espen, Hi Alexander,
OK, those two are fixed. Next ?
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17531
--- Comment #34 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch
21 matches
Mail list logo
