https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17531
--- Comment #28 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
Created attachment 7927
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7927&action=edit
More badness for `readelf -agteAruhlsSdIncwVW --dyn-syms -D`
No crashes so far but some badness...
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17590
--- Comment #1 from David P ---
A workaround/hack I discovered, which I'd recommend if this doesn't get worked
on:
gcc+ld seems pretty deterministic. Compile, run an nm command on the
executable, pull out the addresses of symbols, compile aga
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17593
Bug ID: 17593
Summary: x86-64 gold generates wrong PLT for large model
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Compon
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512
--- Comment #83 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Alexander,
Once more into the breech dear friends...
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512
--- Comment #82 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17590
David P changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||climberking2000 at gmail dot
com
--
You a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17592
Bug ID: 17592
Summary: x86-64 linker generates wrong PLT for large model
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Comp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17590
Bug ID: 17590
Summary: Order of multiple defsym commands irrelevant
Product: binutils
Version: 2.24
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16457
Evangelos Foutras changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||evangelos at foutrelis dot com
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16452
Evangelos Foutras changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||evangelos at foutrelis dot com
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13442
--- Comment #5 from Espen Grindhaug ---
Comparing with and without -Wl,--incremental-full i notice that when compiling
with -Wl,--incremental-full the output binary is missing the .eh_frame_hdr
section.
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13442
espen at grindhaug dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||espen at grindhaug dot org
12 matches
Mail list logo