[Bug binutils/17552] strip/objcopy: directory traversal

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Cherepanov --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #6) > Please try out this patch and see if it gets rid of those left over > temporary files... The patch doesn't apply to git head: patching file binutil

[Bug binutils/17531] readelf -a crashes on fuzzed samples

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17531 --- Comment #13 from Alexander Cherepanov --- Created attachment 7911 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7911&action=edit More badness for `readelf -a` Files: 11 Errors: 40 Invalid read of size ... 2 Process te

[Bug binutils/17512] segfault in PE parser / _bfd_pei_swap_aouthdr_in

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512 --- Comment #68 from Alexander Cherepanov --- Created attachment 7910 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7910&action=edit More badness for `objdump -x` Files: 11 Errors: 1 Argument 'size' of function malloc has a fi

[Bug binutils/17552] strip/objcopy: directory traversal

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552 --- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 7909 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7909&action=edit Cleanup temporary files on error Hi Alexander, Please try out this patch and see if it gets rid of those

[Bug binutils/17552] strip/objcopy: directory traversal

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Alexander, OK - I have checked the patch in. With regard to your questions. 1) Leaving the temporary files behind is not an intended feature, it is a bug. I see about creating a patch to fix it.

[Bug binutils/17533] objdump/ar/... crash on malformed ar file

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17533 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/17552] strip/objcopy: directory traversal

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch,

[Bug ld/17553] .eh_frame_hdr table[0] FDE at 00000978 overlaps table[1] FDE at 000009a0 when not using "-Wl,-traditional" on sh4

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17553 --- Comment #10 from Alan Modra --- That map file isn't from linking the objects you attached here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mai

[Bug ld/17560] New: mips: assertion failure with --as-needed + weak + hidden main function

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17560 Bug ID: 17560 Summary: mips: assertion failure with --as-needed + weak + hidden main function Product: binutils Version: 2.26 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: no

[Bug ld/17553] .eh_frame_hdr table[0] FDE at 00000978 overlaps table[1] FDE at 000009a0 when not using "-Wl,-traditional" on sh4

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17553 --- Comment #9 from glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de --- Since Matthis Klose recently updated binutils in Debian, I was able to test with a freshly compiled version of binutils. Unfortunately, the result is still the same. Here is the outp

[Bug gas/17505] arm: bad static label resolution from different modes

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17505 Christian Bruel changed: What|Removed |Added Component|ld |gas -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug ld/17505] arm: bad static label resolution from different modes

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17505 --- Comment #10 from Christian Bruel --- in the .o dump bar is at .text : ... 0018 : but the call to bar resolves: 4:eb04 bl30 4: R_ARM_CALLbar why the +0x18 addend ? it shoud be eit