[Bug binutils/17423] mips-linux-as call x86-as final

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17423 Xiaofan Tan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/17424] New: Does not build correctly with \r\n line terminators on Cygwin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17424 Bug ID: 17424 Summary: Does not build correctly with \r\n line terminators on Cygwin Product: binutils Version: 2.24 Status: NEW Severity: normal P

[Bug binutils/17422] binutils should support more than one plugin in lib/bfd-plugins and load the right one

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17422 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Created attachment 7804 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7804&action=edit handle more than one plugin patch > Mixed LLVM/gcc archives are of course not supported yet. Actuall

[Bug binutils/17422] binutils should support more than one plugin in lib/bfd-plugins and load the right one

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17422 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to hubicka from comment #4) > Actually I think gold&ld could be updated to load multiple plugins at once > and let different plugins to claim different object files. That way we ought > to

[Bug binutils/17422] binutils should support more than one plugin in lib/bfd-plugins and load the right one

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17422 --- Comment #4 from hubicka at ucw dot cz --- Actually I think gold&ld could be updated to load multiple plugins at once and let different plugins to claim different object files. That way we ought to be able to link program that contains LTO o

[Bug binutils/17422] binutils should support more than one plugin in lib/bfd-plugins and load the right one

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17422 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #7802|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/17423] New: mips-linux-as call x86-as final

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17423 Bug ID: 17423 Summary: mips-linux-as call x86-as final Product: binutils Version: 2.24 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils

[Bug binutils/17422] binutils should support more than one plugin in lib/bfd-plugins and load the right one

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17422 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Created attachment 7802 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7802&action=edit more than one plugin patch Here's the patch that I'm currently testing. -- You are receiving this m

[Bug gas/17421] Internal error in output_insn during kernel build

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17421 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #5 f

[Bug binutils/17422] binutils should support more than one plugin in lib/bfd-plugins and load the right one

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17422 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to ging...@adacore.com from comment #9) > Yes, but the behaviour has changed due to these lines (from the patch): > > +#if BFD_SUPPORTS_PLUGINS > +static const char *plugin_target = "plug

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 --- Comment #11 from gingold at adacore dot com --- On 22 Sep 2014, at 12:58, markus at trippelsdorf dot de wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 > > --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- > (In reply to ging

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 --- Comment #9 from gingold at adacore dot com --- Yes, but the behaviour has changed due to these lines (from the patch): +#if BFD_SUPPORTS_PLUGINS +static const char *plugin_target = "plugin"; +#else static const char *plugin_target = NULL

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to ging...@adacore.com from comment #7) > Hello, > > I think the patch is not correct. > > Unless --target is specified, it creates archives using the "plugin" target, > which may not be

[Bug binutils/13227] GCC now produce slim LTO files. Those can't be linked/archived or nm w/o plugin used. It would be useful to output diagnostics when user attempts so

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227 Bug 13227 depends on bug 14698, which changed state. Bug 14698 Summary: ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 What|Re

[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698 gingold at adacore dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug binutils/17422] New: binutils should support more than one plugin in lib/bfd-plugins and load the right one

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17422 Bug ID: 17422 Summary: binutils should support more than one plugin in lib/bfd-plugins and load the right one Product: binutils Version: 2.25 (HEAD) Status: NEW

[Bug ld/16563] Corrupt .eh-frame section created when linking LTO and non-LTO objects

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16563 --- Comment #10 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch