https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15348
--- Comment #3 from eleventen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to eleventen from comment #2)
> (In reply to DeepaB from comment #1)
> > "lsls" is equivalent UAL syntax for "lsl" thumb instruction."lsls"
> > instruction works if directive ".syntax
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15348
--- Comment #2 from eleventen at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to DeepaB from comment #1)
> "lsls" is equivalent UAL syntax for "lsl" thumb instruction."lsls"
> instruction works if directive ".syntax unified" is specified.
Indeed, the fragment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15348
DeepaB changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||deepa.ballari at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16563
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
The first test case no longer reproduces the problem - but the problem itself
still exists. I have now uploaded a second test case that still demonstrates
the problem.
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16563
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7405|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17205
Martin Husemann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
