http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16515
--- Comment #3 from Stephen Kell ---
Attached (just run make -- it succeeds with the patch, fails without it).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-bi
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16515
--- Comment #2 from Stephen Kell ---
Created attachment 7380
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7380&action=edit
Test case
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16017
--- Comment #18 from Meador Inge ---
Right, my reading of the ARM manuals suggest that with 'ADD , ' (T2
encoding) that Rm can be PC. Only things like 'ADD PC, Rm' and 'ADD PC, PC' are
unpredictable.
I came up with a similar encoding:
0:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16017
--- Comment #17 from Irfan Ahmad ---
I missed an && in the ARM reference manual, :(
addip, pc
Should be legal
addw ip, pc, #0
is not.
So we can rework my suggestion to:
1: f240 0c00 movwip, #0x ; Lower 16 bits of GOT
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16017
--- Comment #16 from Markus Mayer ---
Will thinking about it, I came to the following conclusion (only line 2
differs). It safes 2 byte.
1: push{r0}
2: mov r0, pc
3: movwip, #0x ; Lower 16 bits of GOT entry offset from PC
4: m
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16017
Irfan Ahmad changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h.IrfanAhmad at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16490
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16490
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |2.24
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16489
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Version|unspecified
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16488
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Version|unspecified
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16496
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16017
Meador Inge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meadori at codesourcery dot com
--- Com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16488
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch,
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16489
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch,
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16490
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch,
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16488
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16515
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Do
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16515
Bug ID: 16515
Summary: objcopy cannot weaken undefined symbols
Product: binutils
Version: 2.22
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
18 matches
Mail list logo
