[Bug gas/16075] New: Support i386+ x86 32 bit movd mnemonic

2013-10-22 Thread sourceware.org at neonics dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16075 Bug ID: 16075 Summary: Support i386+ x86 32 bit movd mnemonic Product: binutils Version: 2.23 Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: gas

[Bug binutils/15994] Different source code locations using the same addresses

2013-10-22 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15994 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #7248|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/15994] Different source code locations using the same addresses

2013-10-22 Thread harald.servat at bsc dot es
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15994 --- Comment #8 from Harald Servat --- Hello Nick, my guess is the second is wrong, because the .cpp file is not meant to be in libtdl/.libs when built by the libtool. Is it possible to have a unique output for both? If not, I guess I can

[Bug binutils/15994] Different source code locations using the same addresses

2013-10-22 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15994 --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Harald, I saw this too > main > /home/Computational/harald/analysis-apps/nest-2.2.2/nest/main.cpp:43 > main > /home/Computational/harald/analysis-apps/nest-2.2.2/libltdl/.libs/main.cpp:43 Which one

[Bug binutils/15994] Different source code locations using the same addresses

2013-10-22 Thread harald.servat at bsc dot es
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15994 --- Comment #6 from Harald Servat --- Thank you Nick! It seems that the situation has improved, however there's a slightly issue with respect to the source file. If I repeat the process now (2.23.2+patch) adds libltdl/.libs in the second quer

[Bug gas/16012] Cross Compile of GNU GCC using IBM as the target vendor (powerpc or rs6000) crashes with "exec: -u: invalid option"

2013-10-22 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16012 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Dirk, Hmm, OK, please can you upload the entire GCC command line that causes the problem, and the results it produces ? Please could you also add the "-v" command line option so that we can see the c

[Bug binutils/15994] Different source code locations using the same addresses

2013-10-22 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15994 --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 7248 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7248&action=edit Proposed patch - scan all CUs before reporting best match -- You are receiving this mail because: You are o

[Bug binutils/15994] Different source code locations using the same addresses

2013-10-22 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15994 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING --- Comment #5 from Nick Clift

[Bug binutils/14768] Checklist: Binutils Migration To Git

2013-10-22 Thread tromey at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14768 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---