If I assemble the following assembly
.text
the .text section begins right after the elf header at 0x34 (as expected).
However,
.text
.p2align 4,,1
makes the .text section begin at 0x40, ignoring the third expression, which
is documented as
If doing the alignment would require skipping more byt
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15762
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12761
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Branch: binutils-2_23-branch
Changes by:amo...@sourceware.org2013-07-20 09:57:17
Modified files:
bfd: ChangeLog elflink.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15762
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Branch: binutils-2_23-branch
Changes by:amo...@sourceware.org2013-07-20 09:57:17
Modified files:
bfd: ChangeLog elflink.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15762
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by:amo...@sourceware.org2013-07-20 09:50:16
Modified files:
bfd: ChangeLog elflink.c
Log message:
PR ld/15762
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12761
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by:amo...@sourceware.org2013-07-20 09:50:16
Modified files:
bfd: ChangeLog elflink.c
Log message:
PR ld/15762
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15762
Bug ID: 15762
Summary: glibc built without .gnu.warning.symbol sections
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Compon
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15762
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 7110
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7110&action=edit
fix
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12761
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 fr