Re: Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-04 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 10:27:52AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi Patrice, > > > Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and > > errors. > > Core of the patch is >s/itemx/item/ > right? Everything else seems to be unrelated changes. The patch handles errors/w

Re: Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-04 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Patrice, > Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and > errors. Core of the patch is s/itemx/item/ right? Everything else seems to be unrelated changes. > Norbert ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org

Re: Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-04 Thread Patrice Dumas
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 11:34:26PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > HI Karl, hi all, > > I just came back from Paris, so I cannot provide more details now, > but it seems that binutils has a problem with the .92 pretest: From > the build error log (excerpt) > > > ../../../binutils/doc/binutils.te

[Bug gas/14887] Error: ARM register expected -- `str r1,[ r0 ]'

2013-01-04 Thread pbrobinson at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14887 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pbrobinson at gmail dot com -- Confi