[Bug gold/14187] gold incorrectly requires hexadecimals to start with 0x with -Ttext/-Tdata/-Tbss

2012-08-08 Thread heiko at shruuf dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14187 Heiko Becker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||heiko at shruuf dot de -- Configure bu

[Bug gold/14196] gold mistreats -Wl,-Ttext

2012-08-08 Thread heiko at shruuf dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14196 Heiko Becker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||heiko at shruuf dot de -- Configure bu

[Bug gas/14445] Missing risbgz alternative mnemonic

2012-08-08 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14445 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Target||s390*-* -- Configure bugmail: htt

[Bug gas/14445] New: Missing risbgz alternative mnemonic

2012-08-08 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14445 Bug #: 14445 Summary: Missing risbgz alternative mnemonic Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: gas

[Bug binutils/14444] objdump fails on .ko with -gdwarf-4

2012-08-08 Thread viriketo at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1 --- Comment #1 from Lluís Batlle 2012-08-08 16:35:02 UTC --- I forgot to mention that it has been built with "-gdwarf-4", and optimizations enabled. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Bug binutils/14444] New: objdump fails on .ko with -gdwarf-4

2012-08-08 Thread viriketo at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1 Bug #: 1 Summary: objdump fails on .ko with -gdwarf-4 Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils

[Bug ld/13880] -Bsymbolic fails to handle protected function pointer

2012-08-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13880 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Version|unspecified

[Bug gas/14439] x86/Intel mode: diagnostics for monitor/mwait operands are issued with wrong operand numbers

2012-08-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14439 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2012-08-08 13:20:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Can you add ATTsyntax to existing monitor/wait entries and new > > ones with Intelsyntax to i386-opc.tbl deal with it? > > That mi

[Bug gas/14439] x86/Intel mode: diagnostics for monitor/mwait operands are issued with wrong operand numbers

2012-08-08 Thread jbeulich at novell dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14439 --- Comment #3 from Jan Beulich 2012-08-08 09:35:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Can you add ATTsyntax to existing monitor/wait entries and new > ones with Intelsyntax to i386-opc.tbl deal with it? That might be doable, but as indicated