[Bug ld/11539] ld --gc-sections should work for PE-COFF on MinGW

2011-10-04 Thread shinji.igarashi at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11539 --- Comment #5 from Shinji Igarashi 2011-10-05 03:42:15 UTC --- Created attachment 5960 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5960 Add KEEPs to the linker script template Very nice. The patch saves me from some boring works s

"ar rP" does not work with relative paths

2011-10-04 Thread christian montanari
Hi,I am using ... GNU ar (GNU Binutils) 2.19 Copyright 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ... and the commands: ar rP a.ar b/c.o ar rP a.ar b/c.o will add the object "c.o" twice in the archive "a.ar". is this the correct behaviour? the constraint also is that my "a.ar" archive will have o

[Bug ld/13254] -z text warning breaks gcc testsuite on Solaris

2011-10-04 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13254 --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-10-05 00:47:11 UTC --- gold supports -z text. We should just add support to GNU ld. Basically, if we add a DT_TEXTREL entry, we should give an error if -z text was used. -- Configure bugmail: http:/

[Bug binutils/13257] New: NM + plugin does not list correctly symbols in thin archives

2011-10-04 Thread d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13257 Bug #: 13257 Summary: NM + plugin does not list correctly symbols in thin archives Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug binutils/13256] New: AR + plugin fails with "no operation specified" error

2011-10-04 Thread d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13256 Bug #: 13256 Summary: AR + plugin fails with "no operation specified" error Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 C

[Bug ld/13255] New: Wrong `local symbol is referenced by DSO' warnings on Solaris

2011-10-04 Thread ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13255 Bug #: 13255 Summary: Wrong `local symbol is referenced by DSO' warnings on Solaris Product: binutils Version: 2.22 Status: NEW Severity: critical

[Bug ld/13254] New: -z text warning breaks gcc testsuite on Solaris

2011-10-04 Thread ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13254 Bug #: 13254 Summary: -z text warning breaks gcc testsuite on Solaris Product: binutils Version: 2.22 Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P1 Component: l

[Bug ld/13252] fails to link statically with '[symbol] referenced in section [...]: defined in discarded section [...]' with g++ (Debian 4.6.1-13) 4.6.1 - with test case hyperlinked

2011-10-04 Thread lkajan at rostlab dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13252 --- Comment #1 from Laszlo Kajan 2011-10-04 13:58:25 UTC --- Please find the test case here (too big to attach): http://rostlab.org/~lkajan/ld_testcase_for_defined_in_discarded_section_bug.tgz -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bug

[Bug ld/13252] fails to link statically with '[symbol] referenced in section [...]: defined in discarded section [...]' with g++ (Debian 4.6.1-13) 4.6.1 - with test case hyperlinked

2011-10-04 Thread lkajan at rostlab dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13252 Laszlo Kajan changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|fails to link statically|fails to link statically

[Bug ld/13252] New: fails to link statically with '[symbol] referenced in section [...]: defined in discarded section [...]' with g++ (Debian 4.6.1-13) 4.6.1 - with test case attached

2011-10-04 Thread lkajan at rostlab dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13252 Bug #: 13252 Summary: fails to link statically with '[symbol] referenced in section [...]: defined in discarded section [...]' with g++ (Debian 4.6.1-13) 4.6.1 - with test case

[Bug gold/13245] PREVAILING_DEF reported too often.

2011-10-04 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13245 --- Comment #12 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-10-04 09:41:40 UTC --- > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13245 > > --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-04 09:24:22 UTC --- > On Sun, 2 Oct 2011, Jan Hubicka wrote:

[Bug gold/13245] PREVAILING_DEF reported too often.

2011-10-04 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13245 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-04 09:24:22 UTC --- On Sun, 2 Oct 2011, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > > > Yes, it does solve the problem here (I have 8GB of RAM and used a > > large swapfile on my SSD. It took ~10 minutes to out

[Bug gold/13245] PREVAILING_DEF reported too often.

2011-10-04 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13245 --- Comment #10 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2011-10-04 09:17:43 UTC --- > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13245 > > --- Comment #9 from Cary Coutant 2011-10-03 > 21:50:21 UTC --- > > Here the function test is comdat both in libt

[Bug ld/13250] unresolvable R_X86_64_64 relocations with ld --as-needed

2011-10-04 Thread doko at debian dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13250 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose 2011-10-04 08:58:59 UTC --- self-contained test case at http://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/mpi.tar.xz -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving t

[Bug ld/13250] New: unresolvable R_X86_64_64 relocations with ld --as-needed

2011-10-04 Thread doko at debian dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13250 Bug #: 13250 Summary: unresolvable R_X86_64_64 relocations with ld --as-needed Product: binutils Version: 2.22 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priorit