[Bug gold/12525] gold SEGV linking libgcc_s.so.1 on Solaris 11/x86

2011-07-01 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12525 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug gold/12952] Cannot compile ffmpeg with gold on FreeBSD 8 64bit

2011-07-01 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12952 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug gold/12525] gold SEGV linking libgcc_s.so.1 on Solaris 11/x86

2011-07-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12525 --- Comment #30 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-02 05:30:08 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:i...@sourceware.org2011-07-02 05:30:00 Modified files: gold : ChangeLog dynobj.cc dynobj.h

[Bug gold/12952] Cannot compile ffmpeg with gold on FreeBSD 8 64bit

2011-07-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12952 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-02 05:30:08 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:i...@sourceware.org2011-07-02 05:30:00 Modified files: gold : ChangeLog dynobj.cc dynobj.h

[Bug gold/12952] Cannot compile ffmpeg with gold on FreeBSD 8 64bit

2011-07-01 Thread website-sourceware at interfasys dot ch
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12952 --- Comment #8 from interfaSys sàrl 2011-07-02 01:01:49 UTC --- Would that help if I provided you with an archive containing all the libs? -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

[Bug gold/12525] gold SEGV linking libgcc_s.so.1 on Solaris 11/x86

2011-07-01 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12525 --- Comment #29 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-07-02 00:43:51 UTC --- The failure of two_file_shared_1_nonpic.so is not very interesting. It happens because on Solaris when gcc sees -shared it passes -z text to the linker. GNU ld does not suppor

[Bug gold/12525] gold SEGV linking libgcc_s.so.1 on Solaris 11/x86

2011-07-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12525 --- Comment #28 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-02 00:39:15 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:i...@sourceware.org2011-07-02 00:39:13 Modified files: gold : ChangeLog options.h gol

[Bug gold/12525] gold SEGV linking libgcc_s.so.1 on Solaris 11/x86

2011-07-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12525 --- Comment #27 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-02 00:19:06 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:i...@sourceware.org2011-07-02 00:19:04 Modified files: gold : ChangeLog configure configur

[Bug gold/12525] gold SEGV linking libgcc_s.so.1 on Solaris 11/x86

2011-07-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12525 --- Comment #26 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-02 00:03:28 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:i...@sourceware.org2011-07-02 00:03:25 Modified files: gold : ChangeLog ehframe.cc i386.cc

[Bug gold/12952] Cannot compile ffmpeg with gold on FreeBSD 8 64bit

2011-07-01 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12952 --- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-07-01 23:47:51 UTC --- Thanks for the test case. Unfortunately, I am missing a lot of the input libraries: ../gold/ld-new: error: cannot find -lavcodec ../gold/ld-new: error: cannot find -lavutil ../

[Bug ld/12565] NOLOAD sections empty

2011-07-01 Thread jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12565 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Larmour 2011-07-01 23:22:43 UTC --- Hi Nicl, (In reply to comment #16) > > > > It is documented in ld.texinfo in the 'Output Section Type' node: > > @item NOLOAD > > The section should be marked as not loadable,

[Bug gold/12571] .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame

2011-07-01 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12571 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug gold/12571] .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame

2011-07-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12571 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01 22:05:06 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:i...@sourceware.org2011-07-01 22:05:01 Modified files: gold : ChangeLog ehframe.cc ehframe.

[Bug binutils/12329] avr-objdump -d: wrong op-code

2011-07-01 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12329 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/12329] avr-objdump -d: wrong op-code

2011-07-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12329 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01 16:11:32 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:ni...@sourceware.org2011-07-01 16:11:27 Modified files: opcodes: ChangeLog arm-dis.c avr-dis.

[Bug binutils/12325] ar --target isn't documented

2011-07-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12325 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01 15:02:26 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:ni...@sourceware.org2011-07-01 15:02:22 Modified files: binutils : ChangeLog binutils/doc

[Bug binutils/12325] ar --target isn't documented

2011-07-01 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12325 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ld/12565] NOLOAD sections empty

2011-07-01 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12565 --- Comment #18 from Nick Clifton 2011-07-01 13:10:20 UTC --- Hi Ian, > If you look in the libgloss linker scripts you will see a bunch of uses > of NOLOAD. > > I'm not sure whether any of them are really necessary, but they are > certainly t

Re: [Bug ld/12565] NOLOAD sections empty

2011-07-01 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Ian, If you look in the libgloss linker scripts you will see a bunch of uses of NOLOAD. I'm not sure whether any of them are really necessary, but they are certainly there. Apart from a few .bss sections and one target which uses them to get the addresses of its hardware I/O ports, all of

[Bug ld/12565] NOLOAD sections empty

2011-07-01 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12565 --- Comment #19 from Nick Clifton 2011-07-01 13:14:34 UTC --- Hi Doug, > The ARM linux kernel also uses NOLOAD. Do you know if this entirely for .bss style sections, or maybe for establishing a region of memory mapped hardware or I/O ports

[Bug ld/12565] NOLOAD sections empty

2011-07-01 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12565 --- Comment #17 from Nick Clifton 2011-07-01 12:52:14 UTC --- Hi H.J. >> Also, as far as I can see, this behaviour is not documented anywhere. >> Do you know of any applications that rely upon this feature ? > > NOLOAD means "don't load into

Re: [Bug ld/12565] NOLOAD sections empty

2011-07-01 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi H.J. Also, as far as I can see, this behaviour is not documented anywhere. Do you know of any applications that rely upon this feature ? NOLOAD means "don't load into memory", which maps to NOBITS. Otherwise, it will be loaded into memory. OK, I now get that NOLOAD is effectively a marker

[Bug ld/12565] NOLOAD sections empty

2011-07-01 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12565 --- Comment #16 from Nick Clifton 2011-07-01 12:45:37 UTC --- Hi Jifl, >> Also, as far as I can see, this behaviour is not documented anywhere. > > It is documented in ld.texinfo in the 'Output Section Type' node: > @item NOLOAD > The section

Re: [Bug ld/12565] NOLOAD sections empty

2011-07-01 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Jifl, Also, as far as I can see, this behaviour is not documented anywhere. It is documented in ld.texinfo in the 'Output Section Type' node: @item NOLOAD The section should be marked as not loadable, so that it will not be loaded into memory when the program is run. But that does not doc

[Bug ld/12565] NOLOAD sections empty

2011-07-01 Thread jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12565 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Larmour 2011-07-01 08:57:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > > I spent quite a lot of time wrestling with NOLOAD before > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-09/msg00245.html. I believe we > have fairly st