[Bug ld/12921] sh_offset for SHT_NOBITS sections

2011-06-23 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12921 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ld/12921] sh_offset for SHT_NOBITS sections

2011-06-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12921 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-24 03:36:44 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:amo...@sourceware.org2011-06-24 03:36:40 Modified files: bfd: ChangeLog elf.c Log messa

[Bug ld/12921] sh_offset for SHT_NOBITS sections

2011-06-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12921 --- Comment #10 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-24 03:39:35 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Branch: binutils-2_21-branch Changes by:amo...@sourceware.org2011-06-24 03:39:32 Modified files: bfd

[Bug gas/12915] mips64-linux-as aborts with assertion error building a Linux/MIPS kernel

2011-06-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12915 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-23 20:21:41 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:rsand...@sourceware.org2011-06-23 20:21:38 Modified files: gas/config : tc-mips.c gas/testsu

[Bug ld/12921] sh_offset for SHT_NOBITS sections

2011-06-23 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12921 --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra 2011-06-23 15:31:32 UTC --- Created attachment 5813 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5813 possible fix I'll run the testsuite overnight with my big list of targets to see how this goes. --

[Bug ld/12921] sh_offset for SHT_NOBITS sections

2011-06-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12921 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-23 15:52:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Created attachment 5813 [details] > possible fix > > I'll run the testsuite overnight with my big list of targets to see how this > goes. We also need a testc

[Bug ld/12921] sh_offset for SHT_NOBITS sections

2011-06-23 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12921 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra 2011-06-23 15:08:03 UTC --- Actually older binutils do give cases of sh_offset past end of file. ld/testsuite/ld-elf/tbss3.s assembled and linked with older binutils gives .tbss with sh_offset past end of file.

[Bug ld/12921] sh_offset for SHT_NOBITS sections

2011-06-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12921 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug ld/12921] sh_offset for SHT_NOBITS sections

2011-06-23 Thread jakub at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12921 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-23 13:55:28 UTC --- Sure, at least it got caught by prelink testsuite. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --

[Bug ld/12921] sh_offset for SHT_NOBITS sections

2011-06-23 Thread jakub at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12921 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-23 07:32:34 UTC --- The intention of prelink --undo is that it reverts the binary/shared library to the original, bitwise, content. During prelinking the binary/shared library usually grows, and on un