[Bug ld/12171] New: Local Common symbols cause ld to segfault

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12171 Summary: Local Common symbols cause ld to segfault Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unass

[Bug binutils/12075] binutils doesn't build with zlib-devel-1.2.5.

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12075 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug binutils/12075] binutils doesn't build with zlib-devel-1.2.5.

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12075 --- Comment #6 from sezeroz at gmail dot com 2010-10-29 19:31:05 UTC --- Changing the type of compressed_size from bfd_size_type to uLong should solve it because we are playing with zlib's rules here anyway. Like: Index: bfd/compress.c ===

[Bug binutils/12170] compress.c compilation fails for x86_64-*-mingw*

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12170 sezeroz at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at sourceware dot org --

[Bug binutils/12170] compress.c compilation fails for x86_64-*-mingw*

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12170 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/12075] binutils doesn't build with zlib-devel-1.2.5.

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12075 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.20|2.21 (HEAD) -- Configure bugmail: http://so

[Bug binutils/12075] binutils doesn't build with zlib-devel-1.2.5.

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12075 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-29 18:40:49 UTC --- I have no problem with zlib 1.2.3. Is this a new problem with zlib 1.2.5? -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mai

[Bug binutils/12075] binutils doesn't build with zlib-devel-1.2.5.

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12075 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug binutils/12075] binutils doesn't build with zlib-devel-1.2.5.

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12075 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sezeroz at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from

[Bug binutils/12075] binutils doesn't build with zlib-devel-1.2.5.

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12075 --- Comment #5 from sezeroz at gmail dot com 2010-10-29 18:44:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > I have no problem with zlib 1.2.3. Is this a new problem > with zlib 1.2.5? Bug 12170 is already reported using zlib 1.2.3, so the answer is no.

[Bug binutils/12170] New: compress.c compilation fails for x86_64-*-mingw*

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12170 Summary: compress.c compilation fails for x86_64-*-mingw* Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assi

[Bug gas/12166] Assertion failure in coff_frob_symbol

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12166 --- Comment #6 from Mikhail Glushenkov 2010-10-29 15:24:39 UTC --- I tried your patch, and it works for me. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Bug gas/12166] Assertion failure in coff_frob_symbol

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12166 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org AssignedT

[Bug gas/12166] Assertion failure in coff_frob_symbol

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12166 --- Comment #4 from Dave Korn 2010-10-29 12:29:33 UTC --- Created attachment 5100 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5100 Avoid truncation. Assuming that the frob_symbol hook can't be called twice on the same symbol, which

[Bug ld/6962] ld fails in coffcode.h line 842 in handle_COMDAT

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6962 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ld/6962] ld fails in coffcode.h line 842 in handle_COMDAT

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6962 --- Comment #5 from Pawel Sikora 2010-10-29 12:03:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Hi Pawel, > > Thanks very much for uploading that test file. With it was able to > reproduce > the problem and I think that I have found a fix. Please

[Bug ld/6962] ld fails in coffcode.h line 842 in handle_COMDAT

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6962 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug ld/6962] ld fails in coffcode.h line 842 in handle_COMDAT

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6962 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton 2010-10-29 11:11:05 UTC --- Created attachment 5099 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5099 Only check the base type when looking for a section symbol -- Configure bugmail: http://sourcewar

[Bug binutils/12058] ar s command undocumented

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12058 --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton 2010-10-29 11:07:03 UTC --- Hi Andreas, Something seems to have happened to the automatic process that added checked in patches to the relevant PR. :-( I'll post the patch to the list manually instead. Che

[Bug binutils/12058] ar s command undocumented

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12058 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab 2010-10-29 09:51:07 UTC --- Why didn't I see your patches on the binutils list? -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug binutils/12058] ar s command undocumented

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12058 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug binutils/12058] ar s command undocumented

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12058 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5096|0 |1 is obsolete|