[Bug gas/11972] New: Large immediate for neon vmov (parse_big_immediate) fails

2010-09-02 Thread rmansfield at qnx dot com
$ cat $/bignum.s .fpu neon vmov.i64d16, #-4294967296 @ v2si $ ./as-new ~/bignum.s /home/ryan/bignum.s: Assembler messages: /home/ryan/bignum.s:2: Error: expected or or operand -- `vmov.i64 d16,#-4294967296' Works in 2.20.1. Fails in head and this appears to be due to

Re: bug of ld 2.20.1

2010-09-02 Thread Alan Modra
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 01:25:11PM +0800, 徐超 wrote: > > Recently, I update the toolchain(binutils 2.20.1) I meet one issue > on LD. > When I use LD to link the object with options “–oformat binary “ > and “--start-group –end-group” simultaneously, > LD fail to find the symb

[Bug binutils/11971] config.status produces incompatible defines.awk and config.h

2010-09-02 Thread dhoyt at llnl dot gov
--- Additional Comments From dhoyt at llnl dot gov 2010-09-02 23:10 --- Created an attachment (id=4963) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4963&action=view) Fix for defines.awk -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11971 --- You are receiving this

[Bug binutils/11971] New: config.status produces incompatible defines.awk and config.h

2010-09-02 Thread dhoyt at llnl dot gov
config.h was not being created correctly on my Windows 7 (x86_64) machine using the latest released tools from msys/mingw, causing all sorts of build problems. After investigating the issue, it was narrowed down to a problem with how config.status produces and then uses defines.awk. That awk fil

bug of ld 2.20.1

2010-09-02 Thread 徐超
Recently, I update the toolchain(binutils 2.20.1) I meet one issue on LD. When I use LD to link the object with options “�Coformat binary “ and “--start-group �Cend-group” simultaneously, LD fail to find the symbol. When I remove “―oformat”, it can build the ELF file. I t

[Bug ld/11956] relocation truncated to fit R_MIPS_TLS_GD linking xulrunner

2010-09-02 Thread r0bertz at gentoo dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||r0bertz at gentoo dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11956 --- You are receiving this