[Bug binutils/11419] New: array "signature[8]" may be used uninitialized

2010-03-22 Thread aflyhorse at foxmail dot com
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src/binutils -I. -I../../src/binutils -I../bfd -I../../src/binutils/../bfd -I../../src/binutils/../include -LOCALEDIR="\"/ming w64/share/locale\"" -Dbin_dummy_emulation=bin_vanilla_emulation -W -Wall -stri ct-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wshadow -Wno-format -We

[Bug gold/10238] Gold linker does not resolve symbols using indirect dependencies

2010-03-22 Thread kirill at shutemov dot name
-- What|Removed |Added CC||kirill at shutemov dot name http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10238 --- You are receiving th

[Bug binutils/11416] a small miscode in binutils/readelf.c

2010-03-22 Thread schwab at linux-m68k dot org
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-03-22 16:00 --- http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2010-03/msg00096.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/11416] New: a small miscode in binutils/readelf.c

2010-03-22 Thread aflyhorse at foxmail dot com
on line 6197 to 6205: unsigned char buf[5]; unsigned int i, len; unsigned long offset; for (i = 0; i < 9; i++) { GET_OP (buf[i]); if ((buf[i] & 0x80) == 0) break; } An obviously small wrong

[Bug ld/11413] --no-export-dynamic broken for PIE?

2010-03-22 Thread xake at rymdraket dot net
--- Additional Comments From xake at rymdraket dot net 2010-03-22 08:23 --- Thanks for that, now the testcase passes. But there is still more things exported when compiling a PIE file, then when compiling a "normal" file, is this something we have to live with? $ gcc -o test1 -Wl,--no-