--- Additional Comments From ccoutant at google dot com 2009-11-30 18:48
---
Closing now, sorry!
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOL
--- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 15:22
---
Created an attachment (id=4428)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4428&action=view)
gold's readelf -a
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11033
--- You are receiving th
--- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 15:22
---
Created an attachment (id=4427)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4427&action=view)
ld's readelf -a
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11033
--- You are receiving this
--- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 15:21
---
Created an attachment (id=4426)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4426&action=view)
gold's pvfnoise
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11033
--- You are receiving this
--- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 15:21
---
Created an attachment (id=4425)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4425&action=view)
ld's pvfnoise
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11033
--- You are receiving this m
GNU gold (version 2.20.51-0.20091130.7.fc12 20091130) 1.9
gcc (GCC) 4.4.2 20091027 (Red Hat 4.4.2-7)
Running trunk 20091130 at x86_64. When I rebuild & link mgetty package from
Fedora with ld and gold I get twice that large binaries for gold (both
stripped).
E.g.
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 newman ne
--- Additional Comments From robert dot wohlrab at gmx dot de 2009-11-30
15:12 ---
Yes, wanted to wait until I had a change to test the eglibc fix.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 15:06
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> According to http://bugs.debian.org/556951 it is a Debian specific eglibc bug.
Can we close this then?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10982
--- You are recei
--- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 15:02
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created an attachment (id=4393)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4393&action=view)
> Use PRIx64 instead.
Perhaps if you send it to m-l it will be incorporated fast
--- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 14:59
---
Looks like there were several patches upstream for this issue but none of them
made it upstream. I can see that Fedora added former Roland's patch recently.
What's the status here?
--
http://sourceware.org/bug
--- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 14:46
---
Shouldn't we close this one? Looks like changes were committed to CVS.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10471
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for t
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 14:46
---
Hi Massimo,
Thanks for the bug report and patch. I have applied your patch to the current
mainstream development sources.
Cheers
Nick
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11030
--- You
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-30
14:45 ---
Subject: Bug 11030
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-11-30 14:45:33
Modified files:
opcodes: ChangeLog m68k-opc.c
Log message:
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||russ at eatnumber1 dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10937
--- You are receiving thi
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 14:37
---
Hi Marc,
Thanks for reporting this bug. I have checked in the uploaded patch to fix
the problem.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-30 14:37
---
Created an attachment (id=4424)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4424&action=view)
Add check to prevent seg-fault
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11032
--- You are
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-30
14:36 ---
Subject: Bug 11032
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-11-30 14:36:22
Modified files:
gas: ChangeLog
gas/config : t
--- Additional Comments From marc dot prager at infitec dot net 2009-11-30
12:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=4423)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4423&action=view)
tiny file causing the segmentation violation
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
I'm using arm-none-eabi-as 2.19.1 and assembled a file containing the following:
.syntax unified
.arch armv7-m
.text
.thumb
.func
delay: @ 1 million cycles
ldr r0,#100 @ <- this causes segfault
...
Yes, it should be ldr r0,=100 , but as should not
19 matches
Mail list logo
